Precision in Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-analysis of Navigated Guides for Safe and Effective Pedicle Screw Fixation

Objective: Cervical spine surgery presents unique technical challenges because of the small and complex anatomy of the cervical vertebrae and the high risk of neurovascular complications. Recent advances in 3-dimensional (3D) printing and navigation technologies have been introduced to improve screw placement accuracy, reduce surgical risk, and potentially shorten operative time. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize currently available evidence and to describe selected studies evaluating 3D-printed navigation templates and intraoperative computer-assisted navigation systems for cervical pedicle screw placement.Methods: This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. A literature search was performed for publications published between 2019 and 2024 using the following search terms: (“cervical spine” OR “navigation-assisted system”) OR (“3D printing template” OR “computer-assisted system”). A total of 130 articles met the initial screening criteria, of which 8 studies were included in the final analysis after application of predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.Results: Eight studies were included in the final systematic review and network meta-analysis. The findings indicated that 3D-printed templates demonstrated higher accuracy, reaching up to 95.8% (risk ratio [RR], 1.17), and fewer deviations compared with computer-assisted navigation (RR, 1.05) and traditional techniques (RR, 1.0). Computer-assisted navigation showed greater heterogeneity across studies. However, no statistically significant difference in outcomes was observed between 3D-printed templates and computer-assisted navigation systems.Conclusion: Navigation-assisted cervical pedicle screw fixation is effective, and both 3D-printed templates and computer-assisted navigation techniques provide advantages in terms of accuracy and procedural safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2025.02656
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
39.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precision in Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-analysis of Navigated Guides for Safe and Effective Pedicle Screw Fixation

Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Peem Sarasombath, Vit Kotheeranurak, Roongrath Chitragran
1 citations
Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
39.15
article

Precision in Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-analysis of Navigated Guides for Safe and Effective Pedicle Screw Fixation

Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Peem Sarasombath, Vit Kotheeranurak, Roongrath Chitragran
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: Cervical spine surgery presents unique technical challenges because of the small and complex anatomy of the cervical vertebrae and the high risk of neurovascular complications. Recent advances in 3-dimensional (3D) printing and navigation technologies have been introduced to improve screw placement accuracy, reduce surgical risk, and potentially shorten operative time. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize currently available evidence and to describe selected studies evaluating 3D-printed navigation templates and intraoperative computer-assisted navigation systems for cervical pedicle screw placement.Methods: This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. A literature search was performed for publications published between 2019 and 2024 using the following search terms: (“cervical spine” OR “navigation-assisted system”) OR (“3D printing template” OR “computer-assisted system”). A total of 130 articles met the initial screening criteria, of which 8 studies were included in the final analysis after application of predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.Results: Eight studies were included in the final systematic review and network meta-analysis. The findings indicated that 3D-printed templates demonstrated higher accuracy, reaching up to 95.8% (risk ratio [RR], 1.17), and fewer deviations compared with computer-assisted navigation (RR, 1.05) and traditional techniques (RR, 1.0). Computer-assisted navigation showed greater heterogeneity across studies. However, no statistically significant difference in outcomes was observed between 3D-printed templates and computer-assisted navigation systems.Conclusion: Navigation-assisted cervical pedicle screw fixation is effective, and both 3D-printed templates and computer-assisted navigation techniques provide advantages in terms of accuracy and procedural safety.

Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and TechniqueVol. 11(Suppl 1)
Chulalongkorn University (TH), King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (TH), Phramongkutklao Hospital (TH), University of Phayao (TH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
39.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.