Predicting pedestrian crash risk around bus stops: A multi-city random forest approach

• Bus stops are high-risk areas for pedestrian crashes in cities. • Built environment factors were ranked using CIF and CIS methods across 3 cities. • Random Forest and MLP outperformed ordinal logistic regression in severity prediction. • Larger spatial buffers (up to 250 m) significantly improved predictive performance. Pedestrians account for more than one-fifth of global road fatalities each year, with bus stops in metropolitan areas being high-risk locations due to crowding and frequent crossings. Developing effective interventions to enhance pedestrian safety requires a deep understanding of the built environment factors that contribute to pedestrian crashes across different urban settings. Since pedestrian injuries and fatalities are primarily preventable, applying diverse datasets from various countries is essential to identify and compare the key built environment features influencing pedestrian crashes around bus stops. This study evaluates and predicts the key built environment factors affecting pedestrian crashes within buffer distances of 50, 150, and 250 m around bus stops, using datasets from New York (United States), Toronto (Canada), and Greater Melbourne (Australia) between 2012 and 2016. Three modeling approaches, Random Forest (RF), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Ordinal Logistic Regression (OLR), were applied with systematic hyperparameter tuning, and the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied to address class imbalance. Model performance was compared across cities, buffer sizes, and training–validation–testing splits, and external cross-city validation was conducted to evaluate transferability. Results show that RF consistently outperforms MLP and OLR by capturing nonlinear interactions between built environment features more effectively, with the best-performing RF models for New York and Toronto using a 250-meter buffer, demonstrating that larger buffer distances better capture the influence of the built environment on crash occurrences. Furthermore, Common Important Features (CIF) and Common Important Subfeatures (CIS) are extracted to rank and compare the most influential factors affecting pedestrian crashes in each case study. This information may be used to persuade political leaders to develop, implement, and support pedestrian safety measures around bus stops.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2026.101854
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting pedestrian crash risk around bus stops: A multi-city random forest approach

Farzane Omrani, Marjan Ghaemi, Seyed Ali Ziaee, Rouzbeh Shad et al.
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Predicting pedestrian crash risk around bus stops: A multi-city random forest approach

Farzane Omrani, Marjan Ghaemi, Seyed Ali Ziaee, Rouzbeh Shad, Safa Hadi Abdulzahra
article en

Abstract

• Bus stops are high-risk areas for pedestrian crashes in cities. • Built environment factors were ranked using CIF and CIS methods across 3 cities. • Random Forest and MLP outperformed ordinal logistic regression in severity prediction. • Larger spatial buffers (up to 250 m) significantly improved predictive performance. Pedestrians account for more than one-fifth of global road fatalities each year, with bus stops in metropolitan areas being high-risk locations due to crowding and frequent crossings. Developing effective interventions to enhance pedestrian safety requires a deep understanding of the built environment factors that contribute to pedestrian crashes across different urban settings. Since pedestrian injuries and fatalities are primarily preventable, applying diverse datasets from various countries is essential to identify and compare the key built environment features influencing pedestrian crashes around bus stops. This study evaluates and predicts the key built environment factors affecting pedestrian crashes within buffer distances of 50, 150, and 250 m around bus stops, using datasets from New York (United States), Toronto (Canada), and Greater Melbourne (Australia) between 2012 and 2016. Three modeling approaches, Random Forest (RF), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Ordinal Logistic Regression (OLR), were applied with systematic hyperparameter tuning, and the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied to address class imbalance. Model performance was compared across cities, buffer sizes, and training–validation–testing splits, and external cross-city validation was conducted to evaluate transferability. Results show that RF consistently outperforms MLP and OLR by capturing nonlinear interactions between built environment features more effectively, with the best-performing RF models for New York and Toronto using a 250-meter buffer, demonstrating that larger buffer distances better capture the influence of the built environment on crash occurrences. Furthermore, Common Important Features (CIF) and Common Important Subfeatures (CIS) are extracted to rank and compare the most influential factors affecting pedestrian crashes in each case study. This information may be used to persuade political leaders to develop, implement, and support pedestrian safety measures around bus stops.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 36
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (IR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.