Visual recognition of English loanwords in Korean: The role of lexical frequency and orthographic opacity

This study examined the interaction between semantic and orthographic processing in Korean learners of English as they visually recognize English words. Fifty Korean learners of English performed a visual lexical decision task consisting of 200 stimuli: 50 loanwords, including 25 with a single phonological competitor in Korean and 25 with multiple semantic competitors, 50 control words, and 100 nonwords. Response times were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, and accuracy was analyzed using logistic mixed-effects models. The results showed that loanwords elicited significantly faster responses and higher accuracy than control words. However, the number of semantic competitors and the frequency of use in Korean were not significant predictors. Instead, English lexical frequency significantly influenced both response times and accuracy, and the degree of orthographic (spelling-to-pronunciation) opacity, the extent to which spelling and pronunciation diverge, emerged as an additional key predictor of performance. Specifically, words with higher orthographic opacity tended to yield slower responses and lower accuracy. These results indicate that L2 lexical processing in Korean learners is primarily driven by within-language factors, including English lexical frequency and orthographic opacity, rather than by L1-based familiarity. This finding suggests that cross-linguistic influences on L2 word recognition are constrained by the organization of orthographic and phonological representations in L2 and the strength of orthography-phonology mappings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.26..202601.157
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual recognition of English loanwords in Korean: The role of lexical frequency and orthographic opacity

Donghyun Kim, Yechan Lee
Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Visual recognition of English loanwords in Korean: The role of lexical frequency and orthographic opacity

Donghyun Kim, Yechan Lee
article en

Abstract

This study examined the interaction between semantic and orthographic processing in Korean learners of English as they visually recognize English words. Fifty Korean learners of English performed a visual lexical decision task consisting of 200 stimuli: 50 loanwords, including 25 with a single phonological competitor in Korean and 25 with multiple semantic competitors, 50 control words, and 100 nonwords. Response times were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, and accuracy was analyzed using logistic mixed-effects models. The results showed that loanwords elicited significantly faster responses and higher accuracy than control words. However, the number of semantic competitors and the frequency of use in Korean were not significant predictors. Instead, English lexical frequency significantly influenced both response times and accuracy, and the degree of orthographic (spelling-to-pronunciation) opacity, the extent to which spelling and pronunciation diverge, emerged as an additional key predictor of performance. Specifically, words with higher orthographic opacity tended to yield slower responses and lower accuracy. These results indicate that L2 lexical processing in Korean learners is primarily driven by within-language factors, including English lexical frequency and orthographic opacity, rather than by L1-based familiarity. This finding suggests that cross-linguistic influences on L2 word recognition are constrained by the organization of orthographic and phonological representations in L2 and the strength of orthography-phonology mappings.

Korean Journal of English Language and LinguisticsVol. 26
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.