Assessing global passive microwave soil moisture retrievals in mountainous terrain: insights from in situ validation and extended triple collocation

• Advanced ETC-based evaluation framework for mountain soil moisture retrievals. • Exposed terrain- and vegetation-dependent biases among SMAP, SMOS, and AMSR2. • Quantified dominant controls on retrieval sensitivity across environmental gradients. • Offered guidance for next-generation, terrain-aware soil moisture algorithms. Soil moisture (SM) conditions are closely linked to water availability, energy balance, and ecosystem processes, highlighting the importance of accurate SM data for hydrological modeling and environmental monitoring. Passive microwave products offer large-scale SM estimates, but their validation in mountainous areas remains difficult due to sparse in situ data and complex terrain. This study systematically evaluated three global passive microwave soil moisture products—SMAP, SMOS, and AMSR2—across mountainous regions by integrating in situ observations from the International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN) with the Extended Triple Collocation (ETC) method. Results indicated that SMAP and SMOS outperformed AMSR2 in both in situ and ETC-based evaluations, with higher median correlation coefficients (0.95 for SMAP, 0.84 for SMOS) and lower RMSEs (0.026 and 0.048 m3/m3, respectively). In the Rocky Mountains, where station density is highest, over 86% of sites showed consistent product rankings between in situ and ETC results, confirming the reliability of ETC in data-scarce areas. Further analysis revealed contrasting environmental controls: SMAP’s error increased with slope and vegetation density, while its sensitivity increased with elevation and surface roughness. SMOS showed more stable performance across gradients, whereas AMSR2 was more affected by terrain and vegetation complexity. These findings clarify uncertainty patterns and environmental controls on passive microwave soil moisture retrievals in mountainous regions, and provide insights for product selection, algorithm improvement, and data fusion in hydrological and ecological applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.117707
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing global passive microwave soil moisture retrievals in mountainous terrain: insights from in situ validation and extended triple collocation

Junli Zhao, Jiujiang Wu, Wenkai Zhao, Yanqing Yang et al.
1 citations
Geoderma
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
21.83
article

Assessing global passive microwave soil moisture retrievals in mountainous terrain: insights from in situ validation and extended triple collocation

Junli Zhao, Jiujiang Wu, Wenkai Zhao, Yanqing Yang, Tao Ding
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Advanced ETC-based evaluation framework for mountain soil moisture retrievals. • Exposed terrain- and vegetation-dependent biases among SMAP, SMOS, and AMSR2. • Quantified dominant controls on retrieval sensitivity across environmental gradients. • Offered guidance for next-generation, terrain-aware soil moisture algorithms. Soil moisture (SM) conditions are closely linked to water availability, energy balance, and ecosystem processes, highlighting the importance of accurate SM data for hydrological modeling and environmental monitoring. Passive microwave products offer large-scale SM estimates, but their validation in mountainous areas remains difficult due to sparse in situ data and complex terrain. This study systematically evaluated three global passive microwave soil moisture products—SMAP, SMOS, and AMSR2—across mountainous regions by integrating in situ observations from the International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN) with the Extended Triple Collocation (ETC) method. Results indicated that SMAP and SMOS outperformed AMSR2 in both in situ and ETC-based evaluations, with higher median correlation coefficients (0.95 for SMAP, 0.84 for SMOS) and lower RMSEs (0.026 and 0.048 m3/m3, respectively). In the Rocky Mountains, where station density is highest, over 86% of sites showed consistent product rankings between in situ and ETC results, confirming the reliability of ETC in data-scarce areas. Further analysis revealed contrasting environmental controls: SMAP’s error increased with slope and vegetation density, while its sensitivity increased with elevation and surface roughness. SMOS showed more stable performance across gradients, whereas AMSR2 was more affected by terrain and vegetation complexity. These findings clarify uncertainty patterns and environmental controls on passive microwave soil moisture retrievals in mountainous regions, and provide insights for product selection, algorithm improvement, and data fusion in hydrological and ecological applications.

GeodermaVol. 466
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
21.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.