High-Resolution Modeling of Methane Plumes: Validation and Sensitivity Experiments to Explore Emission Quantification Approaches

Methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions from natural gas, waste, and industrial sources are routinely detected by satellite and aerial platforms; however, quantifying these plumes remains challenging due to their complex structure and rapidly changing fine-scale atmospheric dynamics. This study directly addresses the resulting uncertainties in UAV flight measurements by employing the fire dynamics simulation (FDS) in large eddy simulation (LES) mode, leveraging mean wind data derived from LiDAR data sets. The FDS model was validated with in situ CH<sub>4</sub> concentration data collected by uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) during controlled release experiments. Our analysis of 10 extensively sampled plumes shows that FDS accurately reproduces the magnitude and spatiotemporal variations of the observed plumes for sufficiently large pipes (diameter >0.6 cm). We found that factors such as gas exit velocity, obstacles, and terrain topography significantly affect the near-field dynamics of the plumes. To a lesser extent, the temperature of the gas influences plume behavior at higher mass flow rates. We highlight the added value of high-resolution LES modeling to understand CH<sub>4</sub> plume dynamics captured by various sensors, aiming to improve current emission quantification methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c15941
Primary Topic
Wind and Air Flow Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-Resolution Modeling of Methane Plumes: Validation and Sensitivity Experiments to Explore Emission Quantification Approaches

Charbel Abdallah, Rakesh Yuvaraj, Alexis Groshenry, Jean‐Louis Bonne et al.
Environmental Science & Technology
Wind and Air Flow Studies
article

High-Resolution Modeling of Methane Plumes: Validation and Sensitivity Experiments to Explore Emission Quantification Approaches

Charbel Abdallah, Rakesh Yuvaraj, Alexis Groshenry, Jean‐Louis Bonne, Ngoc Minh Hoang, Julian Akani Guery, Lilian Joly, Philippe Ciais, Thomas Lauvaux
article en

Abstract

Methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions from natural gas, waste, and industrial sources are routinely detected by satellite and aerial platforms; however, quantifying these plumes remains challenging due to their complex structure and rapidly changing fine-scale atmospheric dynamics. This study directly addresses the resulting uncertainties in UAV flight measurements by employing the fire dynamics simulation (FDS) in large eddy simulation (LES) mode, leveraging mean wind data derived from LiDAR data sets. The FDS model was validated with in situ CH<sub>4</sub> concentration data collected by uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) during controlled release experiments. Our analysis of 10 extensively sampled plumes shows that FDS accurately reproduces the magnitude and spatiotemporal variations of the observed plumes for sufficiently large pipes (diameter >0.6 cm). We found that factors such as gas exit velocity, obstacles, and terrain topography significantly affect the near-field dynamics of the plumes. To a lesser extent, the temperature of the gas influences plume behavior at higher mass flow rates. We highlight the added value of high-resolution LES modeling to understand CH<sub>4</sub> plume dynamics captured by various sensors, aiming to improve current emission quantification methods.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 60(5)
Altair Engineering (United States) (US), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), Groupe de Spectrométrie Moléculaire et Atmosphérique (FR), Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire sur les modèles esthétiques et littéraires, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Wind and Air Flow Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.