Comparative efficacy of medications and compound interventions against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus replication in vitro: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) infection induces severe intestinal disease in neonatal piglets, resulting in substantial economic losses to the swine industry. Despite the availability of vaccines, their limited efficacy and the lack of effective antiviral treatments underscore the need for alternative therapeutic approaches. Several studies have reported the antiviral activity of various drugs and compounds against PEDV. To systematically compare the efficacy of these agents, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the inhibitory effects of various drugs or compounds on PEDV replication in vitro using cell based- models. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and ScienceDirect, encompassing publications from the inception of each database to May 30,2025. Eligible studies primarily focused on the effects of pharmacological and combination interventions on PEDV replication in vitro. Changes in the tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) served as the primary outcome measure, with standardized mean difference (SMD) used to quantify effect sizes. Thirty-two eligible studies involving 41 distinct drugs and 63 effect sizes were analyzed. A random-effects model revealed an overall SMD of -12.30 (95% confidence interval: -13.64 to -10.95) for the antiviral efficacy of drugs at safe concentrations. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I²=64.2%, P < 0.001), with subgroup analyses identifying cell type, viral strain, genotype, drug concentration and intervention duration as significant influencing factors (P < 0.05). Intrinsic antiviral activity emerged as the primary source of heterogeneity. Quality assessment using BRISQ guidelines rated 15 studies as high quality and 17 as medium quality, while modified ROBINS-I classified 26 studies as low risk of bias and 6 as moderate risk. Publication bias was suggested by funnel plots and egger’s test. However, sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Forty-one of drugs and compounds demonstrate effective inhibition of PEDV replication in vitro, with antiviral efficacy influenced by experimental variables and predominantly determined by intrinsic antiviral activity. These findings offer valuable guidance for optimizing the design of PEDV antiviral studies and contribute insights for future in vivo efficacy and mechanistic research. Open science framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/V4C8Y).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Veterinary Research
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-026-05306-0
Primary Topic
Animal Virus Infections Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative efficacy of medications and compound interventions against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus replication in vitro: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhiping Mu, Hong Zou, Shilei Huang, Wenting An et al.
BMC Veterinary Research
Animal Virus Infections Studies
article

Comparative efficacy of medications and compound interventions against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus replication in vitro: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhiping Mu, Hong Zou, Shilei Huang, Wenting An, Gan Luo
article en

Abstract

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) infection induces severe intestinal disease in neonatal piglets, resulting in substantial economic losses to the swine industry. Despite the availability of vaccines, their limited efficacy and the lack of effective antiviral treatments underscore the need for alternative therapeutic approaches. Several studies have reported the antiviral activity of various drugs and compounds against PEDV. To systematically compare the efficacy of these agents, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the inhibitory effects of various drugs or compounds on PEDV replication in vitro using cell based- models. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and ScienceDirect, encompassing publications from the inception of each database to May 30,2025. Eligible studies primarily focused on the effects of pharmacological and combination interventions on PEDV replication in vitro. Changes in the tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) served as the primary outcome measure, with standardized mean difference (SMD) used to quantify effect sizes. Thirty-two eligible studies involving 41 distinct drugs and 63 effect sizes were analyzed. A random-effects model revealed an overall SMD of -12.30 (95% confidence interval: -13.64 to -10.95) for the antiviral efficacy of drugs at safe concentrations. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I²=64.2%, P < 0.001), with subgroup analyses identifying cell type, viral strain, genotype, drug concentration and intervention duration as significant influencing factors (P < 0.05). Intrinsic antiviral activity emerged as the primary source of heterogeneity. Quality assessment using BRISQ guidelines rated 15 studies as high quality and 17 as medium quality, while modified ROBINS-I classified 26 studies as low risk of bias and 6 as moderate risk. Publication bias was suggested by funnel plots and egger’s test. However, sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Forty-one of drugs and compounds demonstrate effective inhibition of PEDV replication in vitro, with antiviral efficacy influenced by experimental variables and predominantly determined by intrinsic antiviral activity. These findings offer valuable guidance for optimizing the design of PEDV antiviral studies and contribute insights for future in vivo efficacy and mechanistic research. Open science framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/V4C8Y).

BMC Veterinary Research
Chongqing Academy of Animal Science (CN), Chongqing Three Gorges University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Animal Virus Infections Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.