Comparison of gastric insufflation between LMA Protector and i-gel using ultrasound in adult patients – A randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background and Aims: Second-generation supraglottic airway devices (SADs) have the risk of gastric insufflation and aspiration with positive pressure ventilation. Gastric ultrasound is an emerging point-of-care tool used to assess gastric volume and evaluate perioperative aspiration risk. Hence, we planned this study to compare gastric insufflation using ultrasound between the LMA Protector and i-gel. The primary outcome was to compare the antral cross-sectional area (CSA) between the two SADs. Secondary outcomes included comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure, peak airway pressure, and postoperative complications. Material and Methods: After institutional ethics committee approval and trial registration, 92 patients aged 18–60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I/II/III were recruited. Patients were randomly allocated to groups I (i-gel) and P (LMA Protector). Antral CSA and gastric volume were evaluated before induction, after facemask ventilation (FMV), and before removal of SAD. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Quantitative variables (CSA, gastric volume) were analyzed using independent samples t -test. Results: The mean antral CSA (cm 2 ) and hence gastric volume increased significantly from before induction (2.56; 2.17) to after FMV (2.82; 2.57) and at the end of surgery (3.45; 3.19) in both groups I and P, respectively. However, the difference in CSA and gastric volume between the two groups at any time point was not statistically significant, indicating a comparable increase with both devices ( P = 0.147; 0.356; 322). Oropharyngeal leak pressure (cm H 2 O) was significantly higher in group P (32.43) than in I (35.98) ( P = 0.008). Peak airway pressure and postoperative complications were similar between the groups. Conclusion: Both LMA Protector and i-gel functioned comparably in terms of gastric insufflation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_396_25
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of gastric insufflation between LMA Protector and i-gel using ultrasound in adult patients – A randomized controlled trial

Deepika Kumari, Jatin Lal, Suresh Singhal, Avinash Punia et al.
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
article

Comparison of gastric insufflation between LMA Protector and i-gel using ultrasound in adult patients – A randomized controlled trial

Deepika Kumari, Jatin Lal, Suresh Singhal, Avinash Punia, Dhiren Bhardwaj, Kiranpreet Kaur, Mamta Bhardwaj
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims: Second-generation supraglottic airway devices (SADs) have the risk of gastric insufflation and aspiration with positive pressure ventilation. Gastric ultrasound is an emerging point-of-care tool used to assess gastric volume and evaluate perioperative aspiration risk. Hence, we planned this study to compare gastric insufflation using ultrasound between the LMA Protector and i-gel. The primary outcome was to compare the antral cross-sectional area (CSA) between the two SADs. Secondary outcomes included comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure, peak airway pressure, and postoperative complications. Material and Methods: After institutional ethics committee approval and trial registration, 92 patients aged 18–60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I/II/III were recruited. Patients were randomly allocated to groups I (i-gel) and P (LMA Protector). Antral CSA and gastric volume were evaluated before induction, after facemask ventilation (FMV), and before removal of SAD. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Quantitative variables (CSA, gastric volume) were analyzed using independent samples t -test. Results: The mean antral CSA (cm 2 ) and hence gastric volume increased significantly from before induction (2.56; 2.17) to after FMV (2.82; 2.57) and at the end of surgery (3.45; 3.19) in both groups I and P, respectively. However, the difference in CSA and gastric volume between the two groups at any time point was not statistically significant, indicating a comparable increase with both devices ( P = 0.147; 0.356; 322). Oropharyngeal leak pressure (cm H 2 O) was significantly higher in group P (32.43) than in I (35.98) ( P = 0.008). Peak airway pressure and postoperative complications were similar between the groups. Conclusion: Both LMA Protector and i-gel functioned comparably in terms of gastric insufflation.

Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical PharmacologyVol. 42(2)
Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Maulana Azad Medical College (IN), Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma University of Health Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.