Constructing National Higher Education Brands: Korea, India and Israel Compared

ABSTRACT This study examines the websites of the national higher education (HE) brands of Study in Korea, Study in India and Study in Israel , exploring how these ‘offbeat’ destinations position themselves in the global HE market. Drawing on rhetorical analysis and employing a qualitative comparative case study approach, it reveals the key identity markers and rhetorical strategies employed in each campaign, considering temporal shifts. While these brands share some standardised elements, we suggest that these formats are deployed for different strategic reasons and articulated through varying rhetorical appeals, which may shift over time. We argue that for ‘offbeat’ destinations, nation branding in HE is more than a technocratic marketing tool to exploit niches in a highly competitive, multipolar global HE landscape; it is also a reflection of how states conceptualise their role therein and the value they attribute to international students in advancing national goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Education
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70428
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing National Higher Education Brands: Korea, India and Israel Compared

Annette Bamberger, Sazana Jayadeva, Min Ji Kim
European Journal of Education
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Constructing National Higher Education Brands: Korea, India and Israel Compared

Annette Bamberger, Sazana Jayadeva, Min Ji Kim
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the websites of the national higher education (HE) brands of Study in Korea, Study in India and Study in Israel , exploring how these ‘offbeat’ destinations position themselves in the global HE market. Drawing on rhetorical analysis and employing a qualitative comparative case study approach, it reveals the key identity markers and rhetorical strategies employed in each campaign, considering temporal shifts. While these brands share some standardised elements, we suggest that these formats are deployed for different strategic reasons and articulated through varying rhetorical appeals, which may shift over time. We argue that for ‘offbeat’ destinations, nation branding in HE is more than a technocratic marketing tool to exploit niches in a highly competitive, multipolar global HE landscape; it is also a reflection of how states conceptualise their role therein and the value they attribute to international students in advancing national goals.

European Journal of EducationVol. 61(1)
Bar-Ilan University (IL), University of Surrey (GB), University College London (GB)
Society for Research into Higher Education
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.