Biomechanical Evaluation of Safe Incisions to Mitigate Failure in Tendon Repair

Abstract Background: Rupture at tendon repair sites in animal models impedes the study of healing. To address this, we investigated “safe incisions” – strategic partial transections to prevent rupture under excessive force. We hypothesized these would act as mechanical “fuses,” reducing repair site tension. Objectives: This in vitro biomechanical study optimized safe incision spacing to enhance tendon construct strength and minimize gap formation in a turkey flexor tendon model. Materials and Methods: Forty turkey flexor tendons were divided into five groups ( n = 8): Repaired without incisions, intact with 5 mm incisions, repaired with 5 mm incisions, intact with 10 mm incisions, and repaired with 10 mm incisions. Repairs used a modified Pennington suture. Safe incisions (opposing hemi-transections) with 5 mm or 10 mm longitudinal spacing were created proximally. Tendons were tested to failure at 1 mm/s, recording force-elongation, failure mode, gap formation (>2 mm at 10% strain), stiffness, and repair site elongation. Results: Repaired tendons without incisions (Group 1) showed 100% repair site failure (46.5 ± 10.96 N). With 5 mm safe incisions (Group 3), no repair site failures occurred (incision failure at 18.11 ± 10.96 N). 10 mm incisions (Group 5) offered partial protection (25% repair failure at 37.48 ± 11.35 N). Group 1 had higher gap formation (75% vs. 0% in Group 3, P < 0.01), stiffness, and repair site elongation than Groups 3 and 5. Gap formation force was similar for Group 1 (25.76 ± 9.18 N) and Group 5 (25.04 ± 12.21 N). Conclusions: In this in vitro model, 5 mm spaced safe incisions effectively shifted failure away from the repair and limited gap formation by reducing stiffness. 10 mm incisions provided partial protection. Strategically placed safe incisions show potential to protect tendon repairs from immediate rupture by enabling controlled lengthening at a weaker site. However, tendinopathy risk and clinical relevance require in vivo studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/fjmd.fjmd-d-25-00035
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomechanical Evaluation of Safe Incisions to Mitigate Failure in Tendon Repair

C. Y. HSU, Rou Wan, Hanna Brancaccio, Omar A. Selim et al.
Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Biomechanical Evaluation of Safe Incisions to Mitigate Failure in Tendon Repair

C. Y. HSU, Rou Wan, Hanna Brancaccio, Omar A. Selim, Chunfeng Zhao, Lawrence J. Berglund, Steven Lawrance Moran
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Rupture at tendon repair sites in animal models impedes the study of healing. To address this, we investigated “safe incisions” – strategic partial transections to prevent rupture under excessive force. We hypothesized these would act as mechanical “fuses,” reducing repair site tension. Objectives: This in vitro biomechanical study optimized safe incision spacing to enhance tendon construct strength and minimize gap formation in a turkey flexor tendon model. Materials and Methods: Forty turkey flexor tendons were divided into five groups ( n = 8): Repaired without incisions, intact with 5 mm incisions, repaired with 5 mm incisions, intact with 10 mm incisions, and repaired with 10 mm incisions. Repairs used a modified Pennington suture. Safe incisions (opposing hemi-transections) with 5 mm or 10 mm longitudinal spacing were created proximally. Tendons were tested to failure at 1 mm/s, recording force-elongation, failure mode, gap formation (>2 mm at 10% strain), stiffness, and repair site elongation. Results: Repaired tendons without incisions (Group 1) showed 100% repair site failure (46.5 ± 10.96 N). With 5 mm safe incisions (Group 3), no repair site failures occurred (incision failure at 18.11 ± 10.96 N). 10 mm incisions (Group 5) offered partial protection (25% repair failure at 37.48 ± 11.35 N). Group 1 had higher gap formation (75% vs. 0% in Group 3, P < 0.01), stiffness, and repair site elongation than Groups 3 and 5. Gap formation force was similar for Group 1 (25.76 ± 9.18 N) and Group 5 (25.04 ± 12.21 N). Conclusions: In this in vitro model, 5 mm spaced safe incisions effectively shifted failure away from the repair and limited gap formation by reducing stiffness. 10 mm incisions provided partial protection. Strategically placed safe incisions show potential to protect tendon repairs from immediate rupture by enabling controlled lengthening at a weaker site. However, tendinopathy risk and clinical relevance require in vivo studies.

Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders
Tunghai University (TW), Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TW), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Rowan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.