Methodologies for Assessing Chemical Toxicity to Aquatic Microorganisms: A Comparative Review

Aquatic ecological issues have garnered significant attention in recent years, driving the demand for convenient, effective, and systematic assessment methods in environmental risk evaluation. This review provides a comprehensive introduction to methodologies for assessing the toxicity of chemicals toward aquatic microorganisms, which include viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and algae. Among these, microalgae are commonly used as model organisms due to their relative simplicity. The article details conventional biological methods, general chemical techniques, modern instrumental analyses, and informatics approaches, with a particular focus on algae and bacteria as model organisms for toxicity assessment. The principles, advantages, and limitations of each method are discussed, along with examples of their application in various contexts. Biological methods offer direct visualization, convenience, and rapid results, while modern instrumental techniques enable mechanistic insights at molecular and biochemical levels. Informatics methods facilitate toxicity evaluation in complex systems. While aquatic microorganisms encompass viruses, fungi, protozoa, bacteria, and algae, this review primarily focuses on bacteria and algae as model organisms due to their ecological relevance, sensitivity, and widespread use in standardized assays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecules
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31030485
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodologies for Assessing Chemical Toxicity to Aquatic Microorganisms: A Comparative Review

Q. Z. Chen, Yi Hu, Hong Chen, Changyun Chen et al.
1 citations
Molecules
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
31.09
article

Methodologies for Assessing Chemical Toxicity to Aquatic Microorganisms: A Comparative Review

Q. Z. Chen, Yi Hu, Hong Chen, Changyun Chen, Yao Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aquatic ecological issues have garnered significant attention in recent years, driving the demand for convenient, effective, and systematic assessment methods in environmental risk evaluation. This review provides a comprehensive introduction to methodologies for assessing the toxicity of chemicals toward aquatic microorganisms, which include viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and algae. Among these, microalgae are commonly used as model organisms due to their relative simplicity. The article details conventional biological methods, general chemical techniques, modern instrumental analyses, and informatics approaches, with a particular focus on algae and bacteria as model organisms for toxicity assessment. The principles, advantages, and limitations of each method are discussed, along with examples of their application in various contexts. Biological methods offer direct visualization, convenience, and rapid results, while modern instrumental techniques enable mechanistic insights at molecular and biochemical levels. Informatics methods facilitate toxicity evaluation in complex systems. While aquatic microorganisms encompass viruses, fungi, protozoa, bacteria, and algae, this review primarily focuses on bacteria and algae as model organisms due to their ecological relevance, sensitivity, and widespread use in standardized assays.

MoleculesVol. 31(3)
Nanjing Xiaozhuang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
31.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.