Evaluation of Maxillary Stability in Simultaneous Downward Repositioning and Expansion With Miniplates, Screws, and Allograft

Maxillary expansion and downward repositioning are among the least stable movements in orthognathic surgery. However, they are often necessary for functional and aesthetic purposes. Although combining these movements can reduce the need for multiple surgical procedures, it increases the risk of instability and requires stabilization techniques to prevent relapse. A multitude of approaches have been described, yet the literature remains limited in optimal strategies to enhance long-term outcomes. This retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent simultaneous maxillary expansion and downward repositioning using segmental Le Fort I osteotomy over a 24-month follow-up period. All patients underwent orthodontic preparation, followed by miniplate stabilization and interpositional bone grafting with tibial allogenic blocks. Data collected included surgical movements performed, dental cast measurements, postoperative imaging, and clinical assessment. Overall, 23 patients (mean age: 41.1±10.3 years) were included. All patients underwent maxillary advancement (3-9 mm) with inferior repositioning (2-9 mm), while 19 patients (82.6%) had concomitant mandibular procedures. Intercanine widths increased from 24.0±2.2 mm to 27.5±2.1 mm ( p <0.001), while intermolar widths increased from 33.0±0.6 mm to 38.7±0.7 mm ( p <0.001). Over 24 months, no complications were reported, including dehiscence, graft exposure, gingival recession, root injury, or relapse. Aesthetic improvement was evident in exposure of the incisors, and radiographs confirmed stable bone healing. When using current surgical methods and interdisciplinary coordination, this technique can be executed as a single-stage procedure with safety and reliability, minimizing patient morbidity and eliminating the need for additional interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000012490
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Maxillary Stability in Simultaneous Downward Repositioning and Expansion With Miniplates, Screws, and Allograft

Nicholas J. Iglesias, José Vinícius Bolognesi Maciel, Hana Shah, Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak et al.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Evaluation of Maxillary Stability in Simultaneous Downward Repositioning and Expansion With Miniplates, Screws, and Allograft

Nicholas J. Iglesias, José Vinícius Bolognesi Maciel, Hana Shah, Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak, Seth Ray Thaller, Paulo G. Coelho, Sara E. Munkwitz, Gustavo M. Albuquerque, Joao L. Carlini
article en

Abstract

Maxillary expansion and downward repositioning are among the least stable movements in orthognathic surgery. However, they are often necessary for functional and aesthetic purposes. Although combining these movements can reduce the need for multiple surgical procedures, it increases the risk of instability and requires stabilization techniques to prevent relapse. A multitude of approaches have been described, yet the literature remains limited in optimal strategies to enhance long-term outcomes. This retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent simultaneous maxillary expansion and downward repositioning using segmental Le Fort I osteotomy over a 24-month follow-up period. All patients underwent orthodontic preparation, followed by miniplate stabilization and interpositional bone grafting with tibial allogenic blocks. Data collected included surgical movements performed, dental cast measurements, postoperative imaging, and clinical assessment. Overall, 23 patients (mean age: 41.1±10.3 years) were included. All patients underwent maxillary advancement (3-9 mm) with inferior repositioning (2-9 mm), while 19 patients (82.6%) had concomitant mandibular procedures. Intercanine widths increased from 24.0±2.2 mm to 27.5±2.1 mm ( p <0.001), while intermolar widths increased from 33.0±0.6 mm to 38.7±0.7 mm ( p <0.001). Over 24 months, no complications were reported, including dehiscence, graft exposure, gingival recession, root injury, or relapse. Aesthetic improvement was evident in exposure of the incisors, and radiographs confirmed stable bone healing. When using current surgical methods and interdisciplinary coordination, this technique can be executed as a single-stage procedure with safety and reliability, minimizing patient morbidity and eliminating the need for additional interventions.

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), University of Miami (US), Florida International University (US), Dr. John T. Macdonald Foundation (US), Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR), Universidade de Pernambuco (BR), Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.