Predictors and Risk Scoring of Postnatal Growth Failure in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants

<b>Objectives</b>: To identify factors associated with postnatal growth failure (PGF) in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants and to develop a model for the early identification of neonates at risk. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study included VLBW infants born between 2014 and 2024. PGF was defined using the 2013 Fenton growth chart. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of PGF, and a weighted risk score was derived from their relative contributions. Model performance was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. <b>Results</b>: Among 481 VLBW infants, 334 (69.4%) had PGF. Independent predictors were birth weight < 750 g (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.01-21.83), birth weight 750-1000 g (aOR 2.39; 95% CI, 1.35-4.21), multiple births (aOR 2.82; 95% CI, 1.71-4.67), pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) (aOR 3.32; 95% CI, 2.02-5.46), oligohydramnios (aOR 4.08; 95% CI, 1.68-9.92), no antenatal corticosteroid exposure (aOR 2.97; 95% CI, 1.65-5.36), and formula or mixed feeding (aOR 1.69; 95% CI, 1.08-2.64). The model showed good discrimination for scores ≥2 (area under the ROC curve, 0.736; sensitivity, 71.6%; specificity, 64.5%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Birth weight < 1000 g, multiple births, PIH, oligohydramnios, no antenatal corticosteroid exposure, and formula or mixed feeding were significant predictors of PGF. The score may support early risk stratification and prompt closer nutritional surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18030460
Primary Topic
Infant Nutrition and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors and Risk Scoring of Postnatal Growth Failure in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Supaporn Dissaneevate, Gunlawadee Maneenil, Manapat Praditaukrit, Anucha Thatrimontrichai et al.
Nutrients
Infant Nutrition and Health
article

Predictors and Risk Scoring of Postnatal Growth Failure in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Supaporn Dissaneevate, Gunlawadee Maneenil, Manapat Praditaukrit, Anucha Thatrimontrichai, Nutcha Singhasem
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives</b>: To identify factors associated with postnatal growth failure (PGF) in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants and to develop a model for the early identification of neonates at risk. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study included VLBW infants born between 2014 and 2024. PGF was defined using the 2013 Fenton growth chart. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of PGF, and a weighted risk score was derived from their relative contributions. Model performance was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. <b>Results</b>: Among 481 VLBW infants, 334 (69.4%) had PGF. Independent predictors were birth weight < 750 g (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.01-21.83), birth weight 750-1000 g (aOR 2.39; 95% CI, 1.35-4.21), multiple births (aOR 2.82; 95% CI, 1.71-4.67), pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) (aOR 3.32; 95% CI, 2.02-5.46), oligohydramnios (aOR 4.08; 95% CI, 1.68-9.92), no antenatal corticosteroid exposure (aOR 2.97; 95% CI, 1.65-5.36), and formula or mixed feeding (aOR 1.69; 95% CI, 1.08-2.64). The model showed good discrimination for scores ≥2 (area under the ROC curve, 0.736; sensitivity, 71.6%; specificity, 64.5%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Birth weight < 1000 g, multiple births, PIH, oligohydramnios, no antenatal corticosteroid exposure, and formula or mixed feeding were significant predictors of PGF. The score may support early risk stratification and prompt closer nutritional surveillance.

NutrientsVol. 18(3)
Prince of Songkla University (TH)
Prince of Songkla University, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Infant Nutrition and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.