A new age of infrastructure development? An historical comparison of nested dependency in Pakistan and Egypt

US–China infrastructure competition is touted to enable greater autonomy for the Global South, but a more circumspect survey of the opportunities for southern states is needed. This article problematizes the asymmetry-based accounts prevalent in world order theorizing and offers an alternative, systemic account of inter-state rivalry. Recovering dependency theory and world-systems approaches, we draw on historical comparison between the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (2010–) and the Aswan High Dam in Egypt (1952–1965) as the key Chinese and Soviet transnational infrastructure initiatives amidst US–China rivalry and the Cold War respectively. We show how the Soviet Union and China successfully outcompeted the US by offering alternative, non-conditional modalities in infrastructure development, but that nevertheless resulted in what we conceive to be nested dependency, whereby southern strategies to deepen engagement with the ‘challenger’ power provided only limited insulation from a global system which remains centred around US hegemony.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Globalizations
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2026.2614207
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A new age of infrastructure development? An historical comparison of nested dependency in Pakistan and Egypt

Imogen T. Liu, Nicholas Jepson
Globalizations
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

A new age of infrastructure development? An historical comparison of nested dependency in Pakistan and Egypt

Imogen T. Liu, Nicholas Jepson
article en

Abstract

US–China infrastructure competition is touted to enable greater autonomy for the Global South, but a more circumspect survey of the opportunities for southern states is needed. This article problematizes the asymmetry-based accounts prevalent in world order theorizing and offers an alternative, systemic account of inter-state rivalry. Recovering dependency theory and world-systems approaches, we draw on historical comparison between the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (2010–) and the Aswan High Dam in Egypt (1952–1965) as the key Chinese and Soviet transnational infrastructure initiatives amidst US–China rivalry and the Cold War respectively. We show how the Soviet Union and China successfully outcompeted the US by offering alternative, non-conditional modalities in infrastructure development, but that nevertheless resulted in what we conceive to be nested dependency, whereby southern strategies to deepen engagement with the ‘challenger’ power provided only limited insulation from a global system which remains centred around US hegemony.

Globalizations
The University of Western Australia (AU), University of Manchester (GB), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.