The influence of spatial correlations in crop production on global crop failures in model simulations

Spatial correlation between climate variables may modulate concurrent regional crop failures and reduce global crop production. However, the influence of spatial correlation in crop production fields on globally aggregated production remains poorly understood. Systematically addressing this gap using observed crop production is challenging, as such observational datasets typically suffer from limited sample sizes and/or coarse spatial information. Here, using gridded global simulations from the Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison Phase 3 (GGCMI3), we quantify how spatial correlation between regional crop productions influences global production across different spatial scales for maize, wheat, soybean, and rice. By employing the mean of crop production from multiple crop models forced with reanalysis climate data, we find minimal influence of the correlations between the productions of major breadbasket regions on global breadbasket-aggregated production. This aligns with the fact that global major breadbasket regions are generally non-large and distant from each other, whereas spatial correlations in the crop production field influence global crop production through correlations between small and nearby areas. The correlation between crop production of areas characterized by small spatial scales (100–1000 km) enhances extremely low (5th percentile) global production by about 0.9-1.1 standard deviation of the global production on average. This correlation effect at small spatial scales is less important for weaker extremes of low global crop production. Finally, crop model simulations forced with bias-corrected climate simulations often are not able to reproduce the correlation effects seen in crop model simulations forced with reanalysis climate data, suggesting that bias-corrected climate model input may degrade correlation effects in GGCMI3 crop simulations. These model-based results highlight that spatial correlations are a critical driver of global production risk, stressing the need for improved cross-regional processes representation in crop models to enhance future food security risk assessments. • Using reanalysis-driven crop simulations, we study how correlations among regional productions affect global crop failures. • Correlations among major breadbaskets’ productions minimally affect global production. • Correlations among small/nearby regions’ productions affect global crop production. • Crop simulations driven with bias-corrected climate models often miss correlations seen in reanalysis-driven crop simulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111021
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
67.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of spatial correlations in crop production on global crop failures in model simulations

Emanuele Bevacqua, Zengchao Hao, Jakob Zscheischler, Jonas Jägermeyr et al.
1 citations
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Climate change impacts on agriculture
67.46
article

The influence of spatial correlations in crop production on global crop failures in model simulations

Emanuele Bevacqua, Zengchao Hao, Jakob Zscheischler, Jonas Jägermeyr, Sifang Feng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Spatial correlation between climate variables may modulate concurrent regional crop failures and reduce global crop production. However, the influence of spatial correlation in crop production fields on globally aggregated production remains poorly understood. Systematically addressing this gap using observed crop production is challenging, as such observational datasets typically suffer from limited sample sizes and/or coarse spatial information. Here, using gridded global simulations from the Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison Phase 3 (GGCMI3), we quantify how spatial correlation between regional crop productions influences global production across different spatial scales for maize, wheat, soybean, and rice. By employing the mean of crop production from multiple crop models forced with reanalysis climate data, we find minimal influence of the correlations between the productions of major breadbasket regions on global breadbasket-aggregated production. This aligns with the fact that global major breadbasket regions are generally non-large and distant from each other, whereas spatial correlations in the crop production field influence global crop production through correlations between small and nearby areas. The correlation between crop production of areas characterized by small spatial scales (100–1000 km) enhances extremely low (5th percentile) global production by about 0.9-1.1 standard deviation of the global production on average. This correlation effect at small spatial scales is less important for weaker extremes of low global crop production. Finally, crop model simulations forced with bias-corrected climate simulations often are not able to reproduce the correlation effects seen in crop model simulations forced with reanalysis climate data, suggesting that bias-corrected climate model input may degrade correlation effects in GGCMI3 crop simulations. These model-based results highlight that spatial correlations are a critical driver of global production risk, stressing the need for improved cross-regional processes representation in crop models to enhance future food security risk assessments. • Using reanalysis-driven crop simulations, we study how correlations among regional productions affect global crop failures. • Correlations among major breadbaskets’ productions minimally affect global production. • Correlations among small/nearby regions’ productions affect global crop production. • Crop simulations driven with bias-corrected climate models often miss correlations seen in reanalysis-driven crop simulations.

Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyVol. 379
Goddard Institute for Space Studies (US), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Norsk Hydro (Germany) (DE), Beijing Normal University (CN), Leibniz Association (DE), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE), Columbia University (US), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
67.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.