The Orbital Eccentricity–Radius Relation for Planets Orbiting M Dwarfs

Abstract The orbital eccentricity–radius relation for small planets is indicative of the predominant dynamical sculpting processes during late-stage orbital evolution. Previous studies have shown that planets orbiting Sun-like stars exhibit an eccentricity–radius trend such that larger planets have higher orbital eccentricities, and that radius gap planets may have modestly higher orbital eccentricities than planets on either side of the radius gap. In this work, we investigate the trend for a sample of smaller M dwarf stars. For a sample of 236 single- and multitransit confirmed planets or candidates discovered by the TESS and Kepler missions, we constrain orbital eccentricity for each planet from the transit photometry together with a stellar density prior. We investigate the binned eccentricity–planet radius relation for the combined planet sample and present evidence for a positive eccentricity–radius relationship with elevated eccentricities for planets larger than 3.5 R ⊕ , similar to the trend for planets orbiting Sun-like stars. We find modest evidence that single-transit M dwarf planets near the radius gap exhibit higher eccentricity, consistent with trends for Sun-like stars. However, we see no evidence for an increased eccentricity near the radius gap among multitransit M dwarf planets. We discuss implications for these results in the context of predominant atmospheric loss mechanisms: namely, supporting evidence for photoevaporation in M dwarf planets versus planet–planet collisions or giant impacts in FGK dwarf planets.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ae2d1b
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Orbital Eccentricity–Radius Relation for Planets Orbiting M Dwarfs

Gregory J. Gilbert, Christopher Lam, Sarah Ashley Ballard, Mariangel Albornoz et al.
The Astronomical Journal
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

The Orbital Eccentricity–Radius Relation for Planets Orbiting M Dwarfs

Gregory J. Gilbert, Christopher Lam, Sarah Ashley Ballard, Mariangel Albornoz, Sheila Sagear
article en

Abstract

Abstract The orbital eccentricity–radius relation for small planets is indicative of the predominant dynamical sculpting processes during late-stage orbital evolution. Previous studies have shown that planets orbiting Sun-like stars exhibit an eccentricity–radius trend such that larger planets have higher orbital eccentricities, and that radius gap planets may have modestly higher orbital eccentricities than planets on either side of the radius gap. In this work, we investigate the trend for a sample of smaller M dwarf stars. For a sample of 236 single- and multitransit confirmed planets or candidates discovered by the TESS and Kepler missions, we constrain orbital eccentricity for each planet from the transit photometry together with a stellar density prior. We investigate the binned eccentricity–planet radius relation for the combined planet sample and present evidence for a positive eccentricity–radius relationship with elevated eccentricities for planets larger than 3.5 R ⊕ , similar to the trend for planets orbiting Sun-like stars. We find modest evidence that single-transit M dwarf planets near the radius gap exhibit higher eccentricity, consistent with trends for Sun-like stars. However, we see no evidence for an increased eccentricity near the radius gap among multitransit M dwarf planets. We discuss implications for these results in the context of predominant atmospheric loss mechanisms: namely, supporting evidence for photoevaporation in M dwarf planets versus planet–planet collisions or giant impacts in FGK dwarf planets.

The Astronomical JournalVol. 171(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.