From tools to thinking partners: Cognitive and pedagogical shifts in design education through generative AI

Generative Artificial Intelligence is reshaping design education by influencing how students develop ideas and make creative decisions. Unlike earlier digital shifts that mainly changed production methods, generative AI introduces cognitive changes by moving part of ideation and evaluation into human–AI collaboration. This study offers a rare perspective by comparing design educators’ views on integrating AI in El Salvador and Indonesia, with Denmark as a comparison case. Using a qualitative interpretive approach, interviews with nine academics reveal key themes such as AI as a thinking partner, the persistence of manual-first pedagogy and the rising importance of prompt literacy. Findings show that in resource-limited programs, manual-first traditions provide an important foundation for making curatorial judgments about AI-generated ideas, while Denmark educators use a more structured integration aligned with industry demands. Design educators emphasise ethical awareness and critical judgment, framing AI as a catalyst for rethinking creative processes rather than replacing them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arts and Humanities in Higher Education
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222261420495
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From tools to thinking partners: Cognitive and pedagogical shifts in design education through generative AI

Katja Fleischmann
Arts and Humanities in Higher Education
Design Education and Practice
article

From tools to thinking partners: Cognitive and pedagogical shifts in design education through generative AI

Katja Fleischmann
article en

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence is reshaping design education by influencing how students develop ideas and make creative decisions. Unlike earlier digital shifts that mainly changed production methods, generative AI introduces cognitive changes by moving part of ideation and evaluation into human–AI collaboration. This study offers a rare perspective by comparing design educators’ views on integrating AI in El Salvador and Indonesia, with Denmark as a comparison case. Using a qualitative interpretive approach, interviews with nine academics reveal key themes such as AI as a thinking partner, the persistence of manual-first pedagogy and the rising importance of prompt literacy. Findings show that in resource-limited programs, manual-first traditions provide an important foundation for making curatorial judgments about AI-generated ideas, while Denmark educators use a more structured integration aligned with industry demands. Design educators emphasise ethical awareness and critical judgment, framing AI as a catalyst for rethinking creative processes rather than replacing them.

Arts and Humanities in Higher Education
ArtCenter College of Design (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.