Endoscopic Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine: Implications for Advancements in Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery

Objective: Biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative for lumbar decompression, offering improved visualization with reduced tissue disruption. Therefore, this study aims to identify key anatomical considerations, particularly interlaminar-disc mismatch and the “banana-shaped” curvature of the lamina, and to examine their impact on portal trajectory, alignment of the surgical corridor, and preservation of spinal structures.Methods: A retrospective, video-based analysis was conducted on 23 BESS lumbar decompression cases performed between January and March 2024. Surgical levels included L3–4 (n=3), L4–5 (n=17), and L5–S1 (n=3). Intraoperative anatomical landmarks were assessed independently by 2 spine surgeons. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using Cohen kappa, based on the identification of 3 landmarks per case in 23 cases, calculated with unweighted kappa. Visualization quality was scored on a 3-point scale. Cranial and caudal interlaminar-disc mismatches were measured and averaged.Results: Interlaminar-disc mismatch was identified in 93% of cases, with cranial and caudal mismatches ranging from 5.5±1.02 mm to 8±1.2 mm. Laminar curvature was consistently observed at L4–5 and L5–S1, which required a medial-caudal portal. In addition, the superior articular process (SAP) served as a reliable fluoroscopic and endoscopic landmark, facilitating safe access to the intervertebral disc. A limited medial facetectomy provided adequate operating space. The findings also demonstrated high interobserver reliability for anatomical identification (κ=0.84), and the use of layer-specific flavectomy preserved the inner layer of the ligamentum flavum.Conclusion: Successful BESS requires integrating detailed anatomical understanding with intraoperative adaptability. Recognizing interlaminar-disc mismatch, laminar curvature, and SAP orientation enables optimal portal placement and targeted decompression. These principles are essential for achieving reproducible and safe outcomes in BESS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2025.02411
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endoscopic Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine: Implications for Advancements in Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery

Antonius Gunawan Santoso, Ajid Risdianto, Happy Kurnia, Yuriz Bakthiar et al.
1 citations
Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
36.00
article

Endoscopic Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine: Implications for Advancements in Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery

Antonius Gunawan Santoso, Ajid Risdianto, Happy Kurnia, Yuriz Bakthiar, M. Farhan Ismail, M. Thohar Arifin, Suhartono
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: Biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative for lumbar decompression, offering improved visualization with reduced tissue disruption. Therefore, this study aims to identify key anatomical considerations, particularly interlaminar-disc mismatch and the “banana-shaped” curvature of the lamina, and to examine their impact on portal trajectory, alignment of the surgical corridor, and preservation of spinal structures.Methods: A retrospective, video-based analysis was conducted on 23 BESS lumbar decompression cases performed between January and March 2024. Surgical levels included L3–4 (n=3), L4–5 (n=17), and L5–S1 (n=3). Intraoperative anatomical landmarks were assessed independently by 2 spine surgeons. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using Cohen kappa, based on the identification of 3 landmarks per case in 23 cases, calculated with unweighted kappa. Visualization quality was scored on a 3-point scale. Cranial and caudal interlaminar-disc mismatches were measured and averaged.Results: Interlaminar-disc mismatch was identified in 93% of cases, with cranial and caudal mismatches ranging from 5.5±1.02 mm to 8±1.2 mm. Laminar curvature was consistently observed at L4–5 and L5–S1, which required a medial-caudal portal. In addition, the superior articular process (SAP) served as a reliable fluoroscopic and endoscopic landmark, facilitating safe access to the intervertebral disc. A limited medial facetectomy provided adequate operating space. The findings also demonstrated high interobserver reliability for anatomical identification (κ=0.84), and the use of layer-specific flavectomy preserved the inner layer of the ligamentum flavum.Conclusion: Successful BESS requires integrating detailed anatomical understanding with intraoperative adaptability. Recognizing interlaminar-disc mismatch, laminar curvature, and SAP orientation enables optimal portal placement and targeted decompression. These principles are essential for achieving reproducible and safe outcomes in BESS.

Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and TechniqueVol. 11(Suppl 1)
Diponegoro University (ID), Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID), Dr. Kariadi Hospital (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
36.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.