‘To Share or Not to Share’? Informational Privacy Paradox

ABSTRACT Given our extensive presence online, consumers are increasingly concerned about information confidentiality and risks of potential misuse of personal data by organisations. Interestingly, consumers' beliefs about data privacy are often inconsistent with their actual disclosure behaviours, yielding to a so‐called privacy paradox; an important yet not well‐understood phenomenon, particularly, from an online consumer behavioural perspective. Building on and synthesising prior work, the current study explores the combined effect of general privacy orientation, perceived benefits, consumer sensitivity about information sharing and trust on behavioural intention and ultimately on disclosure behaviour. A total of 652 valid responses were collected using purposive sampling. The empirical data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS‐SEM) with SmartPLS version 4.0. Results demonstrate that individuals concerned about their privacy often express negative intentions, yet in their actual behaviour, they nonetheless choose to share personal information with sellers. Furthermore, we find that perceived benefits, information sensitivity and trust have a positive impact on individuals' intention to share information, with privacy calculus and trust playing a further mediating role guiding the relationship between privacy concerns and behavioural intention. Finally, we complement the literature by proposing a scale to assess the informational privacy paradox phenomenon in an e‐commerce context. Implications for theory and managerial practice are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Consumer Studies
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70182
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘To Share or Not to Share’? Informational Privacy Paradox

Bernadett Köles, J.C. Paul, B. P. Kushwaha
International Journal of Consumer Studies
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

‘To Share or Not to Share’? Informational Privacy Paradox

Bernadett Köles, J.C. Paul, B. P. Kushwaha
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Given our extensive presence online, consumers are increasingly concerned about information confidentiality and risks of potential misuse of personal data by organisations. Interestingly, consumers' beliefs about data privacy are often inconsistent with their actual disclosure behaviours, yielding to a so‐called privacy paradox; an important yet not well‐understood phenomenon, particularly, from an online consumer behavioural perspective. Building on and synthesising prior work, the current study explores the combined effect of general privacy orientation, perceived benefits, consumer sensitivity about information sharing and trust on behavioural intention and ultimately on disclosure behaviour. A total of 652 valid responses were collected using purposive sampling. The empirical data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS‐SEM) with SmartPLS version 4.0. Results demonstrate that individuals concerned about their privacy often express negative intentions, yet in their actual behaviour, they nonetheless choose to share personal information with sellers. Furthermore, we find that perceived benefits, information sensitivity and trust have a positive impact on individuals' intention to share information, with privacy calculus and trust playing a further mediating role guiding the relationship between privacy concerns and behavioural intention. Finally, we complement the literature by proposing a scale to assess the informational privacy paradox phenomenon in an e‐commerce context. Implications for theory and managerial practice are discussed.

International Journal of Consumer StudiesVol. 50(2)
Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), SKEMA Business School (FR), Korea University (KR), University of Puerto Rico System (PR), Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.