Energy house 2.0: The design, build, commissioning, performance & early findings of a large-scale building physics test facility

The global issue of climate change is now readily accepted by most. Buildings contribute 40% of EU emissions, so the need to address mitigation is clear, but changing climate also creates a need for adaptation in buildings. Modelling is an accepted way of estimating the performance of buildings, but issues exist with accuracy and assumptions. This calls for measurements to be made on new build and retrofit homes. However, field measurements can have issues; they are time consuming, expensive, and can also be intrusive. It is for these reasons that the facilities “Salford Energy House” and “Energy House 2.0” were constructed at the University of Salford in the UK. These globally unique facilities allow for full scale homes to be built inside climatic chambers where variables such as temperature, wind, rain, solar radiation, and snow can be replicated, meaning weather conditions experienced by 95% of the worlds populated land mass can be simulated. The chambers are currently home to five structures in total; examining future housing systems, conservatories, window treatments and whole house retrofit scenarios. In this paper we will discuss the design, construction, benefits, limitations, and an overview of research findings from these facilities. Practical application This paper provides insights and learnings as to how environmental chambers shall be designed, specified, constructed and commissioned to lead to successful facilities, it gives details on some of the issues that were encountered around the energy performance gap. Also, some key learnings are delivered from the initial rounds of research on ASHP and building fabric that are useful for domestic design engineers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building Services Engineering Research and Technology
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01436244261419278
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy house 2.0: The design, build, commissioning, performance & early findings of a large-scale building physics test facility

Ljubomir Jankovic, Grant Henshaw, X. Zhang, Richard Fitton et al.
Building Services Engineering Research and Technology
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Energy house 2.0: The design, build, commissioning, performance & early findings of a large-scale building physics test facility

Ljubomir Jankovic, Grant Henshaw, X. Zhang, Richard Fitton, William Swan, Toby Le Hunte, Ben Roberts
article en

Abstract

The global issue of climate change is now readily accepted by most. Buildings contribute 40% of EU emissions, so the need to address mitigation is clear, but changing climate also creates a need for adaptation in buildings. Modelling is an accepted way of estimating the performance of buildings, but issues exist with accuracy and assumptions. This calls for measurements to be made on new build and retrofit homes. However, field measurements can have issues; they are time consuming, expensive, and can also be intrusive. It is for these reasons that the facilities “Salford Energy House” and “Energy House 2.0” were constructed at the University of Salford in the UK. These globally unique facilities allow for full scale homes to be built inside climatic chambers where variables such as temperature, wind, rain, solar radiation, and snow can be replicated, meaning weather conditions experienced by 95% of the worlds populated land mass can be simulated. The chambers are currently home to five structures in total; examining future housing systems, conservatories, window treatments and whole house retrofit scenarios. In this paper we will discuss the design, construction, benefits, limitations, and an overview of research findings from these facilities. Practical application This paper provides insights and learnings as to how environmental chambers shall be designed, specified, constructed and commissioned to lead to successful facilities, it gives details on some of the issues that were encountered around the energy performance gap. Also, some key learnings are delivered from the initial rounds of research on ASHP and building fabric that are useful for domestic design engineers.

Building Services Engineering Research and TechnologyVol. 47(2)
University of Salford (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Energy house 2.0: The design, build, commissioning, performance & early findings of a large-scale building physics test facility — Ljubomir Jankovic, Grant Henshaw, et al. · Building Services Engineering Research and Technology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS