Emerging_Responsiblity_Roles_in_AI_Governance

This working paper presents an exploratory qualitative study on how responsibility roles emerge in artificial intelligence governance across socio-technical systems. Drawing on sensemaking theory, socio-technical systems perspectives, role theory, and governance-as-practice approaches, the study analyzes publicly available professional discourse across healthcare, insurance, regulatory, research, and technology domains over a one-month observation period. Using inductive qualitative coding of several thousand public professional posts and discussions, the paper identifies recurring patterns of influence, mediation, translation, and accountability that manifest as emergent governance roles. The findings suggest that responsibility in AI ecosystems is dynamically negotiated through interaction rather than institutionally fixed. The paper contributes an initial taxonomy of emergent responsibility roles and proposes hypotheses for future empirical research. This version represents an analytical snapshot within an ongoing longitudinal study and is intended to invite scholarly feedback and interdisciplinary dialogue.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18436595
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emerging_Responsiblity_Roles_in_AI_Governance

Terrance Biederer
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Emerging_Responsiblity_Roles_in_AI_Governance

Terrance Biederer
article en

Abstract

This working paper presents an exploratory qualitative study on how responsibility roles emerge in artificial intelligence governance across socio-technical systems. Drawing on sensemaking theory, socio-technical systems perspectives, role theory, and governance-as-practice approaches, the study analyzes publicly available professional discourse across healthcare, insurance, regulatory, research, and technology domains over a one-month observation period. Using inductive qualitative coding of several thousand public professional posts and discussions, the paper identifies recurring patterns of influence, mediation, translation, and accountability that manifest as emergent governance roles. The findings suggest that responsibility in AI ecosystems is dynamically negotiated through interaction rather than institutionally fixed. The paper contributes an initial taxonomy of emergent responsibility roles and proposes hypotheses for future empirical research. This version represents an analytical snapshot within an ongoing longitudinal study and is intended to invite scholarly feedback and interdisciplinary dialogue.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.