Equitable Pretrial Justice for Indigenous Accused? Exploring the Role of <i>Gladue</i> at Bail

Abstract The Supreme Court of Canada mandates recognition of systemic factors that create barriers for Indigenous peoples’ access to equitable justice. Specifically, R. v. Gladue directs courts to consider the unique circumstances of Indigenous peoples when engaging in decision-making processes in all criminal courts. Drawing from interview data with Indigenous and non-Indigenous defence counsel in Ontario, this study assesses whether and how Gladue factors shape bail hearings. Our findings reveal that the application of Gladue principles exists along a continuum, ranging from mere “lip service”, to the tailoring of bail decisions based on meaningful recognition of systemic disadvantages. We also highlight the importance of lived experience and representation of Indigenous legal actors and the challenges they encounter working within a colonial system. We situate these findings within broader critiques of risk-based bail frameworks and settler colonial legal systems, concluding with policy recommendations and directions for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2025.10032
Primary Topic
New Caledonia Indigenous Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equitable Pretrial Justice for Indigenous Accused? Exploring the Role of Gladue at Bail

Carolyn Yule, Laura MacDiarmid
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société
New Caledonia Indigenous Studies
article

Equitable Pretrial Justice for Indigenous Accused? Exploring the Role of Gladue at Bail

Carolyn Yule, Laura MacDiarmid
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Supreme Court of Canada mandates recognition of systemic factors that create barriers for Indigenous peoples’ access to equitable justice. Specifically, R. v. Gladue directs courts to consider the unique circumstances of Indigenous peoples when engaging in decision-making processes in all criminal courts. Drawing from interview data with Indigenous and non-Indigenous defence counsel in Ontario, this study assesses whether and how Gladue factors shape bail hearings. Our findings reveal that the application of Gladue principles exists along a continuum, ranging from mere “lip service”, to the tailoring of bail decisions based on meaningful recognition of systemic disadvantages. We also highlight the importance of lived experience and representation of Indigenous legal actors and the challenges they encounter working within a colonial system. We situate these findings within broader critiques of risk-based bail frameworks and settler colonial legal systems, concluding with policy recommendations and directions for future research.

Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société
University of Guelph-Humber (CA), University of Guelph (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
New Caledonia Indigenous Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.