Endoscopic full-thickness resection and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection: Strategies for resecting subepithelial lesions

Subepithelial lesions of the gastrointestinal tract are masses with an overlying layer of normal mucosa, most frequently found in the stomach and often detected incidentally. They may originate from the submucosa, muscularis mucosa, or muscularis propria and encompass a broad differential diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasound provides important diagnostic information and lesion characterization, enabling risk stratification and guiding the selection of resection technique where indicated. Management is determined by malignancy risk, lesion size, and patient-specific factors. While observation is appropriate in many asymptomatic cases involving small lesions, resection is indicated for larger lesions (> 2 cm), symptomatic cases, inconclusive pathology results, and/or when the presence of a lesion confers significant psychological or financial burden to the patient. Recent advancements in endoscopic resection techniques have expanded treatment options beyond surgery, enabling minimally invasive and organ-sparing approaches. Techniques include endoscopic submucosal resection with cap- or ligation-assisted resection and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for lesions primarily involving the submucosa. Larger or deeper lesions are addressed through endoscopic full-thickness resection, which can be categorized into exposed and nonexposed methods. Each has technical considerations, including closure strategies, size limitations, and complication risks. Exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection offers high en bloc resection rates but carries a risk of perforation, whereas nonexposed tunneling techniques are preferred in anatomically challenging regions such as the esophagus. Device-assisted resection using full-thickness resection devices presents a promising “one-stop” solution for selected subepithelial lesions but may be limited by lesion size and device constraints. Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach informed by lesion characteristics, advanced resection expertise, and the available technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18528/ijgii250078
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endoscopic full-thickness resection and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection: Strategies for resecting subepithelial lesions

Xiaobei Luo, Tiffany Yeh Chua
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
article

Endoscopic full-thickness resection and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection: Strategies for resecting subepithelial lesions

Xiaobei Luo, Tiffany Yeh Chua
article en

Abstract

Subepithelial lesions of the gastrointestinal tract are masses with an overlying layer of normal mucosa, most frequently found in the stomach and often detected incidentally. They may originate from the submucosa, muscularis mucosa, or muscularis propria and encompass a broad differential diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasound provides important diagnostic information and lesion characterization, enabling risk stratification and guiding the selection of resection technique where indicated. Management is determined by malignancy risk, lesion size, and patient-specific factors. While observation is appropriate in many asymptomatic cases involving small lesions, resection is indicated for larger lesions (> 2 cm), symptomatic cases, inconclusive pathology results, and/or when the presence of a lesion confers significant psychological or financial burden to the patient. Recent advancements in endoscopic resection techniques have expanded treatment options beyond surgery, enabling minimally invasive and organ-sparing approaches. Techniques include endoscopic submucosal resection with cap- or ligation-assisted resection and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for lesions primarily involving the submucosa. Larger or deeper lesions are addressed through endoscopic full-thickness resection, which can be categorized into exposed and nonexposed methods. Each has technical considerations, including closure strategies, size limitations, and complication risks. Exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection offers high en bloc resection rates but carries a risk of perforation, whereas nonexposed tunneling techniques are preferred in anatomically challenging regions such as the esophagus. Device-assisted resection using full-thickness resection devices presents a promising “one-stop” solution for selected subepithelial lesions but may be limited by lesion size and device constraints. Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach informed by lesion characteristics, advanced resection expertise, and the available technology.

International Journal of Gastrointestinal InterventionVol. 15(1)
University of Florida (US), Nanfang Hospital (CN), Zhuhai People's Hospital (CN), Southern Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.