Patient‐reported outcome measures after non‐diffractive extended range of field <scp>IOL</scp> implantation: <scp>PureSee</scp> versus Vivity
Acrysof Vivity was associated with greater spectacle-independent near visual acuity and visual function for reading, while PureSee outperformed in photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivities, glare, starburst, and overall dysphotopsia. Based on these pros and cons, optimal extended range of field IOL selection should be aligned with the individual's needs and concerns.
Authors
- Sohee Jeon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1291-0963)
- Dong Gyu Na
- Raimo Tuuminen
- Kyungmin Koh
Institutions
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Kim's Eye Hospital (KR)
- Nune Eye Hospital (KR)
- Kymenlaakson keskussairaala (FI)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Acta Ophthalmologica
- Published
- 2026-01-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.70076
- Primary Topic
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00