Intelligence-based prediction of coefficient of performance for a novel high-temperature industrial heat pump: Comparative performance of ANN and ANFIS models

This study presents a comparative evaluation of the artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approaches for predicting the coefficient of performance (COP) of the HoegTemp, a high-temperature heat pump (HTHP) based on a Stirling cycle (SC) with a design heat capacity of 400 kW. Experimental tests were conducted at the IVAR biogas facility in Stavanger, Norway. This study employed a feedforward backpropagation neural network (FFBPNN) model with one and two hidden layers, with various numbers of neurons and three activation functions, as well as the ANFIS approach, to estimate the COP of the SC-HTHP. The FFBPNN model used the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) and Bayesian regularization (BR) training algorithms, while the ANFIS model utilized a hybrid optimization method and grid partitioning. The ANN and ANFIS models were evaluated using the following input variables: temperature ratio (1.4–1.6 K/K), average source temperature (21–22 °C), average sink temperature (139–199 °C) and hot water inlet temperature (137–197 °C), with COP as the output variable. The results demonstrated that the FFBP-ANN model exhibited superior predictive accuracy compared to the ANFIS model, achieving R 2 = 0.9999, MSE = 0.00010, MAE = 0.00804, and RMSE = 0.01000, whereas the ANFIS approach resulted in R 2 = 0.9863, MSE = 0.00019, MAE = 0.01114, and RMSE = 0.01392. The optimal ANN topology was 4–23-16–1 with tansig–logsig–purelin activation functions. In contrast, the best membership functions selected for ANFIS were Gaussian for the input layer and constant for the output layer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Buildings
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.117078
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intelligence-based prediction of coefficient of performance for a novel high-temperature industrial heat pump: Comparative performance of ANN and ANFIS models

Arne Høeg, J.D. Marcos, Alex Butean, Iman Golpour et al.
Energy and Buildings
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
article

Intelligence-based prediction of coefficient of performance for a novel high-temperature industrial heat pump: Comparative performance of ANN and ANFIS models

Arne Høeg, J.D. Marcos, Alex Butean, Iman Golpour, RUBÉN BARBERO, Antonio Rovira
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative evaluation of the artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approaches for predicting the coefficient of performance (COP) of the HoegTemp, a high-temperature heat pump (HTHP) based on a Stirling cycle (SC) with a design heat capacity of 400 kW. Experimental tests were conducted at the IVAR biogas facility in Stavanger, Norway. This study employed a feedforward backpropagation neural network (FFBPNN) model with one and two hidden layers, with various numbers of neurons and three activation functions, as well as the ANFIS approach, to estimate the COP of the SC-HTHP. The FFBPNN model used the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) and Bayesian regularization (BR) training algorithms, while the ANFIS model utilized a hybrid optimization method and grid partitioning. The ANN and ANFIS models were evaluated using the following input variables: temperature ratio (1.4–1.6 K/K), average source temperature (21–22 °C), average sink temperature (139–199 °C) and hot water inlet temperature (137–197 °C), with COP as the output variable. The results demonstrated that the FFBP-ANN model exhibited superior predictive accuracy compared to the ANFIS model, achieving R 2 = 0.9999, MSE = 0.00010, MAE = 0.00804, and RMSE = 0.01000, whereas the ANFIS approach resulted in R 2 = 0.9863, MSE = 0.00019, MAE = 0.01114, and RMSE = 0.01392. The optimal ANN topology was 4–23-16–1 with tansig–logsig–purelin activation functions. In contrast, the best membership functions selected for ANFIS were Gaussian for the input layer and constant for the output layer.

Energy and BuildingsVol. 356
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO), Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES), Energy Norway (NO), Samueli Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.