Nutritional Risk Assessment and Its Prognostic Impact in Critically Ill Patients with Neurological Diseases

The research aims to apply and evaluate a standardized protocol for nutritional risk assessment and nutritional support management, and to assess its predictive value in individuals with severe neurological disorders who are at risk of malnutrition. A retrospective analysis was performed on 930 suitable patients hospitalized in the Neurology Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, between January 2012 and December 2019. At discharge, patients were categorized based on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) results (excellent prognosis: mRS 0-2, n = 600; bad prognosis: mRS 3-6, n = 330) and survival status (survivor: n = 869; deceased: n = 61). The protocol included baseline characteristics and biochemical evaluations, admission Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) scores, identifying the nutritional support modality, estimation of typical energy intake throughout the first 7 days, and level of disease evaluation using standardized assessment instruments such as the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Univariate studies, multivariate logistic regression estimation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve assessment were used to assess predictive significance. The standardized protocol enabled the systematic identification of nutritional risk, stratification of clinical severity, and early guidance for planning nutritional interventions. Key risk indicators, including elevated NRS 2002, APACHE II, and NIHSS scores, advanced age, and inadequate early energy intake, were associated with unfavorable outcomes. In contrast, higher GCS and adequate vitamin B12 levels demonstrated protective tendencies. ROC analysis confirmed that NRS 2002 provided the most effective predictive utility for both functional outcome and survival status. The findings demonstrate that structured nutritional risk assessment and standardized support implementation offer practical value for early prognostic judgment and Nutritional decision-making for severely ill individuals suffering from neurological diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3791/69710
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nutritional Risk Assessment and Its Prognostic Impact in Critically Ill Patients with Neurological Diseases

Yuping Wang, Na Chen, Yan Zhang, Fei Tian et al.
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Nutritional Risk Assessment and Its Prognostic Impact in Critically Ill Patients with Neurological Diseases

Yuping Wang, Na Chen, Yan Zhang, Fei Tian, Yingying Su, Zhongyun Chen
article en

Abstract

The research aims to apply and evaluate a standardized protocol for nutritional risk assessment and nutritional support management, and to assess its predictive value in individuals with severe neurological disorders who are at risk of malnutrition. A retrospective analysis was performed on 930 suitable patients hospitalized in the Neurology Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, between January 2012 and December 2019. At discharge, patients were categorized based on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) results (excellent prognosis: mRS 0-2, n = 600; bad prognosis: mRS 3-6, n = 330) and survival status (survivor: n = 869; deceased: n = 61). The protocol included baseline characteristics and biochemical evaluations, admission Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) scores, identifying the nutritional support modality, estimation of typical energy intake throughout the first 7 days, and level of disease evaluation using standardized assessment instruments such as the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Univariate studies, multivariate logistic regression estimation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve assessment were used to assess predictive significance. The standardized protocol enabled the systematic identification of nutritional risk, stratification of clinical severity, and early guidance for planning nutritional interventions. Key risk indicators, including elevated NRS 2002, APACHE II, and NIHSS scores, advanced age, and inadequate early energy intake, were associated with unfavorable outcomes. In contrast, higher GCS and adequate vitamin B12 levels demonstrated protective tendencies. ROC analysis confirmed that NRS 2002 provided the most effective predictive utility for both functional outcome and survival status. The findings demonstrate that structured nutritional risk assessment and standardized support implementation offer practical value for early prognostic judgment and Nutritional decision-making for severely ill individuals suffering from neurological diseases.

Journal of Visualized Experiments(227)
Capital Medical University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.