Sectoral Cost-Benefit Analysis for Clean Technology Demonstrators: Insights for Decarbonizing Hard-to-Abate Industries

Adopting disruptive technologies to decarbonize hard-to-abate industrial sectors requires experimentation through demonstration (pilot) projects. However, from an economic perspective, the potential long-term benefits and the challenges of designing effective public policies are often overlooked in standard valuations of these projects. This paper demonstrates that conducting cost-benefit analysis (CBA) at the sectoral level offers valuable insights to address these issues. It accounts for knowledge spillovers from the pilot project across the industry and incorporates technical changes in value-added cost components of adjacent activities. Such an analysis identifies the optimal trajectory for decarbonizing the sector. Our proposed CBA framework also determines the relevant abatement cost for the pilot project, a critical indicator for public policy. Applied to France’s large-scale, high-quality container glass sector, the CBA estimates an abatement cost of approximately €200/tCO2 for the pilot deploying a decarbonized hybrid technology—45% lower than previous standard approaches. Furthermore, we demonstrate that subsidizing the pilot project, combined with a commitment to transfer knowledge to follower plants, is sufficient to achieve the social optimum, provided governments implement an emissions tax that internalizes environmental costs. This approach can be extended to other hard-to-abate sectors, enabling the early deployment of disruptive innovations and facilitating the design of effective public policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Resource Economics
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-025-01051-4
Primary Topic
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sectoral Cost-Benefit Analysis for Clean Technology Demonstrators: Insights for Decarbonizing Hard-to-Abate Industries

Elodie Le Cadre Loret, Murès Zaréa, Maryam Sadighi, Maria Eugenia Sanin et al.
Environmental and Resource Economics
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
article

Sectoral Cost-Benefit Analysis for Clean Technology Demonstrators: Insights for Decarbonizing Hard-to-Abate Industries

Elodie Le Cadre Loret, Murès Zaréa, Maryam Sadighi, Maria Eugenia Sanin, Jean-Pierre Ponssard
article en

Abstract

Adopting disruptive technologies to decarbonize hard-to-abate industrial sectors requires experimentation through demonstration (pilot) projects. However, from an economic perspective, the potential long-term benefits and the challenges of designing effective public policies are often overlooked in standard valuations of these projects. This paper demonstrates that conducting cost-benefit analysis (CBA) at the sectoral level offers valuable insights to address these issues. It accounts for knowledge spillovers from the pilot project across the industry and incorporates technical changes in value-added cost components of adjacent activities. Such an analysis identifies the optimal trajectory for decarbonizing the sector. Our proposed CBA framework also determines the relevant abatement cost for the pilot project, a critical indicator for public policy. Applied to France’s large-scale, high-quality container glass sector, the CBA estimates an abatement cost of approximately €200/tCO2 for the pilot deploying a decarbonized hybrid technology—45% lower than previous standard approaches. Furthermore, we demonstrate that subsidizing the pilot project, combined with a commitment to transfer knowledge to follower plants, is sufficient to achieve the social optimum, provided governments implement an emissions tax that internalizes environmental costs. This approach can be extended to other hard-to-abate sectors, enabling the early deployment of disruptive innovations and facilitating the design of effective public policies.

Environmental and Resource EconomicsVol. 89(2)
École Polytechnique (FR), Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay - Etablissement de Saclay (FR), Engie (France) (FR), Centre de Recherche en Économie et Statistique (FR), Équipe de Recherche sur l’Utilisation des Données Individuelles en Lien avec la Théorie Économique (FR)
AgroParisTech, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Fondation du Risque, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.