Feasibility and Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Objective: Endoscopic techniques are rapidly evolving, with surgery becoming much safer and less invasive. One of these procedures is lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). Although the principle of the operation is consistent among surgeons, the technique varies greatly. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of Full Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (e-TLIF) and report the results.Methods: In this retrospective study, data were collected from a hospital database. All patients who underwent e-TLIF from January 2022 to June 2024 were included. Results were analyzed on the basis of the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain outcomes and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional disability at 3 and 6 months.Results: In total, 53 patients were identified during the study period. All patients underwent full-endoscopic LIF through a posterior approach. The average hospital stay was 24 hours. The mean follow-up period was 20.9 (range, 6–36) months. Significant improvement in VAS and ODI was observed at 6 months. All patients had satisfactory outcomes.Conclusion: Full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is a safe and effective procedure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2025.02327
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Harshavardhan Biradar, F. Anagha Despandhe, Girish Prakash Datar
Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Feasibility and Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Harshavardhan Biradar, F. Anagha Despandhe, Girish Prakash Datar
article en

Abstract

Objective: Endoscopic techniques are rapidly evolving, with surgery becoming much safer and less invasive. One of these procedures is lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). Although the principle of the operation is consistent among surgeons, the technique varies greatly. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of Full Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (e-TLIF) and report the results.Methods: In this retrospective study, data were collected from a hospital database. All patients who underwent e-TLIF from January 2022 to June 2024 were included. Results were analyzed on the basis of the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain outcomes and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional disability at 3 and 6 months.Results: In total, 53 patients were identified during the study period. All patients underwent full-endoscopic LIF through a posterior approach. The average hospital stay was 24 hours. The mean follow-up period was 20.9 (range, 6–36) months. Significant improvement in VAS and ODI was observed at 6 months. All patients had satisfactory outcomes.Conclusion: Full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is a safe and effective procedure.

Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and TechniqueVol. 11(Suppl 1)
Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Feasibility and Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion — Harshavardhan Biradar, F. Anagha Despandhe, et al. · Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS