Situational and Dispositional Achievement Goals’ Relationships with Measures of State and Trait Sport Confidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024575181) was to quantify the relationships between dispositional and situational achievement goal involvement and sport confidence. A secondary purpose was to examine potential moderators of these relationships. Published studies reporting sufficient data, including one achievement goal measure from the dichotomous framework and one measure of sport confidence in an athlete sample, were included. Information sources included EBSCOhost databases, Web of Science databases, and relevant meta-analyses. The random-effects correlational coefficient (<i>r</i>) served as the summary statistic. Thirty-six studies yielding 37 independent samples, published between 1988 and 2026, which met all inclusion criteria, representing a total of 10,461 participants from youth to elite sports across four continents. Meta-analyzed random-effects correlations between task climate (k = 15, <i>r</i> = 0.33 [95% CI 0.23, 0.43]), ego climate (k = 13, <i>r</i> = -0.08 [95% CI -0.16, -0.00]), task orientation (k = 26, <i>r</i> = 0.27 [95% CI 0.21, 0.32]), ego orientation (k = 26, <i>r</i> = 0.11 [95% CI 0.06, 0.17]), and sport confidence ranged from small and negative to medium and positive in magnitude. Mixed-effects moderator analyses revealed significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) for task climate when comparing state (<i>r</i> = 0.24) versus trait (<i>r</i> = 0.41) sport confidence measures, for task orientation scale (TEOSQ r = 0.31 vs. POSQ <i>r</i> = 0.18) in relation to sport confidence, and for study quality (lowest <i>r</i> = 0.35, medium <i>r</i> = 0.18, highest <i>r</i> = 0.24) in the task orientation-sport confidence relationship. However, nearly all prediction intervals for the examined relationships crossed zero, with the exception of a few TEOSQ- and POSQ-based moderator analyses. Thus, researchers and practitioners are cautioned that relationships between dispositional achievement goals, motivational climate perceptions, and sport confidence might be minimal or vary based on the dispositional achievement goal measure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe16020018
Primary Topic
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Situational and Dispositional Achievement Goals’ Relationships with Measures of State and Trait Sport Confidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Marc Robert Lochbaum, Hannah Quick
European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
article

Situational and Dispositional Achievement Goals’ Relationships with Measures of State and Trait Sport Confidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Marc Robert Lochbaum, Hannah Quick
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024575181) was to quantify the relationships between dispositional and situational achievement goal involvement and sport confidence. A secondary purpose was to examine potential moderators of these relationships. Published studies reporting sufficient data, including one achievement goal measure from the dichotomous framework and one measure of sport confidence in an athlete sample, were included. Information sources included EBSCOhost databases, Web of Science databases, and relevant meta-analyses. The random-effects correlational coefficient (<i>r</i>) served as the summary statistic. Thirty-six studies yielding 37 independent samples, published between 1988 and 2026, which met all inclusion criteria, representing a total of 10,461 participants from youth to elite sports across four continents. Meta-analyzed random-effects correlations between task climate (k = 15, <i>r</i> = 0.33 [95% CI 0.23, 0.43]), ego climate (k = 13, <i>r</i> = -0.08 [95% CI -0.16, -0.00]), task orientation (k = 26, <i>r</i> = 0.27 [95% CI 0.21, 0.32]), ego orientation (k = 26, <i>r</i> = 0.11 [95% CI 0.06, 0.17]), and sport confidence ranged from small and negative to medium and positive in magnitude. Mixed-effects moderator analyses revealed significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) for task climate when comparing state (<i>r</i> = 0.24) versus trait (<i>r</i> = 0.41) sport confidence measures, for task orientation scale (TEOSQ r = 0.31 vs. POSQ <i>r</i> = 0.18) in relation to sport confidence, and for study quality (lowest <i>r</i> = 0.35, medium <i>r</i> = 0.18, highest <i>r</i> = 0.24) in the task orientation-sport confidence relationship. However, nearly all prediction intervals for the examined relationships crossed zero, with the exception of a few TEOSQ- and POSQ-based moderator analyses. Thus, researchers and practitioners are cautioned that relationships between dispositional achievement goals, motivational climate perceptions, and sport confidence might be minimal or vary based on the dispositional achievement goal measure.

European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and EducationVol. 16(2)
Texas Tech University (US), Vytautas Magnus University (LT), Lubbock Christian University (US)
Texas Tech University
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.