Quantifying the Influence of Climate on Storm Activity Using Machine Learning

Abstract Midlatitude storms vary due to the slowly evolving climate and the rapidly changing synoptic conditions. While the impact of both factors has been studied extensively, their relative contributions remain poorly quantified. We use 84 years of ERA‐5 reanalysis data and convolutional neural networks to assess the relative importance of seasonal climatology versus synoptic conditions in controlling averaged and individual storm activity. Our models successfully predict over 90% of the variability in mean storm activity, showing climatic conditions dominate it. However, only one‐third of the variability in individual storm properties is attributed to climatic factors, indicating that synoptic conditions dominate individual storm characteristics. Further isolating the impact of long‐term climate trends on individual storms shows that it contributes to storm‐intensity variability only . In contrast, its contribution to storms' associated heat anomalies is over three times greater, demonstrating that variables directly linked to global warming provide a clearer pathway for weather attribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl118496
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the Influence of Climate on Storm Activity Using Machine Learning

Or Hadas, Yohai Kaspi
1 citations
Geophysical Research Letters
Climate variability and models
36.62
article

Quantifying the Influence of Climate on Storm Activity Using Machine Learning

Or Hadas, Yohai Kaspi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Midlatitude storms vary due to the slowly evolving climate and the rapidly changing synoptic conditions. While the impact of both factors has been studied extensively, their relative contributions remain poorly quantified. We use 84 years of ERA‐5 reanalysis data and convolutional neural networks to assess the relative importance of seasonal climatology versus synoptic conditions in controlling averaged and individual storm activity. Our models successfully predict over 90% of the variability in mean storm activity, showing climatic conditions dominate it. However, only one‐third of the variability in individual storm properties is attributed to climatic factors, indicating that synoptic conditions dominate individual storm characteristics. Further isolating the impact of long‐term climate trends on individual storms shows that it contributes to storm‐intensity variability only . In contrast, its contribution to storms' associated heat anomalies is over three times greater, demonstrating that variables directly linked to global warming provide a clearer pathway for weather attribution.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(3)
Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate variability and models
36.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.