Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Acute Severe Colitis and Fulminant Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Subtotal colectomy is the gold standard for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) refractory to medical therapy. While laparoscopy is preferred for elective resections, its safety and efficacy in the emergency setting remain debated due to the technical challenges of manipulating friable, dilated bowel in critically ill patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open subtotal colectomy for ASUC and fulminant colitis. A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to identify comparative studies published until 2025. The primary outcome was overall postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, and mortality. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and robustness was evaluated via sensitivity analyses and meta-regression. Methodological quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Fourteen studies, comprising 6,544 patients (4,357 laparoscopic and 2,187 open), were included. The laparoscopic approach was associated with a significant reduction in overall morbidity (odds ratio (OR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.53; p < 0.0001) with no statistical heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Hospital LOS was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (weighted mean difference -3.07 days, 95% CI -3.88 to -2.25; p < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses stratified by surgical era (pre-biologic vs. biologic) showed no difference in outcomes (p = 0.38), indicating sustained benefits over time. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that results were not driven by large registry data. Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for ASUC is associated with significantly lower postoperative morbidity and shorter hospital stay compared to open surgery. These benefits are robust across different surgical eras and study designs. Laparoscopy should be considered the preferred approach for emergency colectomy in colitis when expertise is available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.102605
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Acute Severe Colitis and Fulminant Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ali Metwaly, Amjad Alsharif, Abdulrahman K Alshuaib, Raneem I Osman et al.
Cureus
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Acute Severe Colitis and Fulminant Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ali Metwaly, Amjad Alsharif, Abdulrahman K Alshuaib, Raneem I Osman, Abdullah S Shaqrun, Bourhan Alrayes, Khalid B Mohammed, Marwa Aldoubali, Shaheen S Almusthi
article en

Abstract

Subtotal colectomy is the gold standard for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) refractory to medical therapy. While laparoscopy is preferred for elective resections, its safety and efficacy in the emergency setting remain debated due to the technical challenges of manipulating friable, dilated bowel in critically ill patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open subtotal colectomy for ASUC and fulminant colitis. A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to identify comparative studies published until 2025. The primary outcome was overall postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, and mortality. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and robustness was evaluated via sensitivity analyses and meta-regression. Methodological quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Fourteen studies, comprising 6,544 patients (4,357 laparoscopic and 2,187 open), were included. The laparoscopic approach was associated with a significant reduction in overall morbidity (odds ratio (OR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.53; p < 0.0001) with no statistical heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Hospital LOS was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (weighted mean difference -3.07 days, 95% CI -3.88 to -2.25; p < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses stratified by surgical era (pre-biologic vs. biologic) showed no difference in outcomes (p = 0.38), indicating sustained benefits over time. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that results were not driven by large registry data. Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for ASUC is associated with significantly lower postoperative morbidity and shorter hospital stay compared to open surgery. These benefits are robust across different surgical eras and study designs. Laparoscopy should be considered the preferred approach for emergency colectomy in colitis when expertise is available.

CureusVol. 18(1)
University of Khartoum (SD), University Hospital Coventry (GB), Warwickshire Hospital (GB), Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies (SA), Sion College (GB), National Ribat University (SD), Al Zawiya University (LY), National Centre for Research (Sudan) (SD), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA), Islamic Hospital (JO), Al-Sabah Hospital (KW), Helwan University (EG), Alexandria University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.