Working Memory of Multi-Object Scenes in Primate Frontal Cortex

Working memory allows primates to reason about complex scenes, yet how the brain maintains multiple objects in memory simultaneously remains unclear. Competing theories propose that objects are stored in discrete slots<sup>1,2</sup>, represented dynamically through switching<sup>3-6</sup>, or encoded by weighted combinations of single-object representations<sup>7-11</sup>. We formalized these hypotheses in terms of their quantitative predictions at the level of single neurons and tested them against densely recorded neural data from the dorsomedial frontal cortex and frontal eye field of monkeys trained to perform a novel multi-object working-memory task. Across cross-validated neural data, a Gain model, where population activity reflects weighted compositions of individual object responses, consistently outperformed Slot and Switching models. Trial-specific gain estimates predicted behavioral errors and reaction times, indicating that these latent weights capture meaningful fluctuations in memory fidelity. All results replicated in an independent dataset with different spatial configurations. Together, our work provides a rigorous framework to adjudicate a longstanding debate about how the frontal cortex retains multiple objects, identifying a weighted-sum representation as the format that best explains the neural data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-01-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.702062
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Working Memory of Multi-Object Scenes in Primate Frontal Cortex

Nicholas Watters, Mehrdad Jazayeri, John Gabel, Joshua B. Tenenbaum
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Working Memory of Multi-Object Scenes in Primate Frontal Cortex

Nicholas Watters, Mehrdad Jazayeri, John Gabel, Joshua B. Tenenbaum
article en

Abstract

Working memory allows primates to reason about complex scenes, yet how the brain maintains multiple objects in memory simultaneously remains unclear. Competing theories propose that objects are stored in discrete slots<sup>1,2</sup>, represented dynamically through switching<sup>3-6</sup>, or encoded by weighted combinations of single-object representations<sup>7-11</sup>. We formalized these hypotheses in terms of their quantitative predictions at the level of single neurons and tested them against densely recorded neural data from the dorsomedial frontal cortex and frontal eye field of monkeys trained to perform a novel multi-object working-memory task. Across cross-validated neural data, a Gain model, where population activity reflects weighted compositions of individual object responses, consistently outperformed Slot and Switching models. Trial-specific gain estimates predicted behavioral errors and reaction times, indicating that these latent weights capture meaningful fluctuations in memory fidelity. All results replicated in an independent dataset with different spatial configurations. Together, our work provides a rigorous framework to adjudicate a longstanding debate about how the frontal cortex retains multiple objects, identifying a weighted-sum representation as the format that best explains the neural data.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US), McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.