Carbon Performance in Airlines: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Institutional and Firm‐Level Drivers

ABSTRACT Air transport is one of the fastest‐growing sources of greenhouse gas emissions, yet it remains one of the most difficult sectors to decarbonize. The sector's climate impact is amplified by two factors: the steady rise in passenger demand and the absence of commercially viable low‐carbon technologies for long‐haul flights. At the same time, international regulation is fragmented, offering inconsistent incentives for airlines to reduce emissions. This study examines why some airlines perform better than others in reducing their carbon emissions. We analyze how company strategies interact with national and regional regulatory contexts. Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), we study a sample of 34 international airlines. Our contributions are threefold. First, stringent institutional pressures can act as country‐specific advantages to push higher carbon performance. Second, institutional complexity can lead to higher carbon performance through possible compensation effects. Third, the ability of multinational enterprises to leverage such country‐specific advantages depends on firm‐specific conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70604
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon Performance in Airlines: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Institutional and Firm‐Level Drivers

Sarianna M. Lundan, Jouni K. Juntunen, Tiina Ritvala
Sustainable Development
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Carbon Performance in Airlines: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Institutional and Firm‐Level Drivers

Sarianna M. Lundan, Jouni K. Juntunen, Tiina Ritvala
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Air transport is one of the fastest‐growing sources of greenhouse gas emissions, yet it remains one of the most difficult sectors to decarbonize. The sector's climate impact is amplified by two factors: the steady rise in passenger demand and the absence of commercially viable low‐carbon technologies for long‐haul flights. At the same time, international regulation is fragmented, offering inconsistent incentives for airlines to reduce emissions. This study examines why some airlines perform better than others in reducing their carbon emissions. We analyze how company strategies interact with national and regional regulatory contexts. Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), we study a sample of 34 international airlines. Our contributions are threefold. First, stringent institutional pressures can act as country‐specific advantages to push higher carbon performance. Second, institutional complexity can lead to higher carbon performance through possible compensation effects. Third, the ability of multinational enterprises to leverage such country‐specific advantages depends on firm‐specific conditions.

Sustainable Development
University of Bremen (DE), University of Vaasa (FI), Aalto University (FI)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.