Standardising interdisciplinary rounds (IDR) structure using ‘TASSK-IT’: description of an innovative framework with positive preliminary outcomes data

Background Interdisciplinary rounds (IDR) are ubiquitous in hospitals; however, empirical outcomes data linked to a clearly defined standard framework remain lacking. Methods This is a pre/post-quasi-experimental study on five inpatient medicine units. The authors created a novel IDR framework TASSK-IT ( T iming, A ttendance, S teering, S cripted K ey elements and I nformation T echnology). They used patient list dashboards that extracted relevant information for each key element, developed a script that generates an assigned action plan and displayed them on large unit-based screens. All patients discharged from the units that implemented TASSK-IT were reviewed for improvements in observed: expected length of stay, Foley and central line catheter days and related infections, hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPI) and advance care planning (ACP) documentation. Results There was a reduction in O:E LOS (0.92 vs 0.84, p<0.001), percent of indwelling urinary catheter days per 1000 inpatient days (9.88% vs 4.52%, p<0.001), catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates per 1000 inpatient days (0.14 vs 0.03, p=0.002), central line days per 1000 inpatient days (7.7% vs 6.35%, p<0.001), central line-associated bloodstream infection rate per 1000 device and patient days (2.21 vs 0.43, p=0.002) and (0.17 vs 0.03, p=0.001), respectively, and HAPIs (3.13 vs 1.92, p=0.006). Documentation of ACP improved by completion of electronic medical orders for life-sustaining treatment (EMOLST) (15.87% vs 67.22%, p<0.001) and ACP notes (45.22 vs 59.05%, p<0.001). Conclusion This descriptive analysis and implementation of TASSK-IT served as a novel structure of IDR that demonstrated a positive impact on patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Innovations
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2025-001419
Primary Topic
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standardising interdisciplinary rounds (IDR) structure using ‘TASSK-IT’: description of an innovative framework with positive preliminary outcomes data

Michael Wachs, Celia M. Gonzalez, Frank Volpicelli, Erwin Wang et al.
BMJ Innovations
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
article

Standardising interdisciplinary rounds (IDR) structure using ‘TASSK-IT’: description of an innovative framework with positive preliminary outcomes data

Michael Wachs, Celia M. Gonzalez, Frank Volpicelli, Erwin Wang, Yunan Zhao, Marwa Moussa, Julia Capelli
article en

Abstract

Background Interdisciplinary rounds (IDR) are ubiquitous in hospitals; however, empirical outcomes data linked to a clearly defined standard framework remain lacking. Methods This is a pre/post-quasi-experimental study on five inpatient medicine units. The authors created a novel IDR framework TASSK-IT ( T iming, A ttendance, S teering, S cripted K ey elements and I nformation T echnology). They used patient list dashboards that extracted relevant information for each key element, developed a script that generates an assigned action plan and displayed them on large unit-based screens. All patients discharged from the units that implemented TASSK-IT were reviewed for improvements in observed: expected length of stay, Foley and central line catheter days and related infections, hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPI) and advance care planning (ACP) documentation. Results There was a reduction in O:E LOS (0.92 vs 0.84, p<0.001), percent of indwelling urinary catheter days per 1000 inpatient days (9.88% vs 4.52%, p<0.001), catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates per 1000 inpatient days (0.14 vs 0.03, p=0.002), central line days per 1000 inpatient days (7.7% vs 6.35%, p<0.001), central line-associated bloodstream infection rate per 1000 device and patient days (2.21 vs 0.43, p=0.002) and (0.17 vs 0.03, p=0.001), respectively, and HAPIs (3.13 vs 1.92, p=0.006). Documentation of ACP improved by completion of electronic medical orders for life-sustaining treatment (EMOLST) (15.87% vs 67.22%, p<0.001) and ACP notes (45.22 vs 59.05%, p<0.001). Conclusion This descriptive analysis and implementation of TASSK-IT served as a novel structure of IDR that demonstrated a positive impact on patient outcomes.

BMJ Innovations
Staten Island University Hospital (US), New York Hospital Queens (US), White Plains Hospital (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.