Spinal cord stimulation therapy for gait impairment in Parkinson’s disease: a double-blinded, randomised feasibility trial with an open extension

A trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was performed in people with gait-impaired Parkinson's (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05110053 ). Fourteen patients underwent gait assessments and [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG and [<sup>18</sup>F]-FEOBV PET at baseline, six, and twelve months after SCS. Twelve participants were randomised to six-month MicroBurst or sham, followed by six-month extension with stimulation. The primary outcomes were feasibility and safety, as captured by the trial process measures and nature and frequency of adverse events, respectively, and the Postural Instability and Gait Disorder (PIGD) score as a clinical outcome. Secondary outcomes included assessments of balance and gait at home and at visits, including the Lower Body and Gait (LBG) score, imaging, and patient-reported outcomes of changes in gait, balance and quality of life. Seventeen patients (12%) were eligible for enrolment. Recruitment was feasible (1.2 participants/month) and SCS was well-tolerated. At six months, MicroBurst did not significantly improve gait compared with sham, although bradykinesia/rigidity improved. At 12 months, LBG scores improved (-4.31 points, p = 0.0012) with bilateral decreased thalamic metabolism and decreased right anterior insula [<sup>18</sup>F]-FEOBV uptake. The trial met its primary feasibility and safety endpoints by achieving recruitment targets and demonstrating that SCS was well-tolerated. However, it did not meet the primary clinical endpoint of a significant PIGD improvement at six months. Larger trials are warranted, as SCS may improve LBG and leg rigidity/bradykinesia, especially as time progresses. We reported data for power calculations and identified important risks for designing future trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68782-w
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spinal cord stimulation therapy for gait impairment in Parkinson’s disease: a double-blinded, randomised feasibility trial with an open extension

Jacob Horsager, T. Henriksen, Victor S. Hvingelby, Nandi Dipankar et al.
Nature Communications
Pain Management and Treatment
article

Spinal cord stimulation therapy for gait impairment in Parkinson’s disease: a double-blinded, randomised feasibility trial with an open extension

Jacob Horsager, T. Henriksen, Victor S. Hvingelby, Nandi Dipankar, Erik Johnsen, Miriam Højholt Terkelsen, Andreas Myhre Baun, Jens Christian Hedemann Sørensen, Rikke Nan Valdemarsen, M L Møller, Elena Moro, Anne Sofie Møller Andersen, Erik Hvid Danielsen, Per Borghammer, Anne Lene Knudsen, Yen F. Tai, Andreas Nørgaard Glud, Kaare Meier, Nicola Pavese, Niels Okkels
article en

Abstract

A trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was performed in people with gait-impaired Parkinson's (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05110053 ). Fourteen patients underwent gait assessments and [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG and [<sup>18</sup>F]-FEOBV PET at baseline, six, and twelve months after SCS. Twelve participants were randomised to six-month MicroBurst or sham, followed by six-month extension with stimulation. The primary outcomes were feasibility and safety, as captured by the trial process measures and nature and frequency of adverse events, respectively, and the Postural Instability and Gait Disorder (PIGD) score as a clinical outcome. Secondary outcomes included assessments of balance and gait at home and at visits, including the Lower Body and Gait (LBG) score, imaging, and patient-reported outcomes of changes in gait, balance and quality of life. Seventeen patients (12%) were eligible for enrolment. Recruitment was feasible (1.2 participants/month) and SCS was well-tolerated. At six months, MicroBurst did not significantly improve gait compared with sham, although bradykinesia/rigidity improved. At 12 months, LBG scores improved (-4.31 points, p = 0.0012) with bilateral decreased thalamic metabolism and decreased right anterior insula [<sup>18</sup>F]-FEOBV uptake. The trial met its primary feasibility and safety endpoints by achieving recruitment targets and demonstrating that SCS was well-tolerated. However, it did not meet the primary clinical endpoint of a significant PIGD improvement at six months. Larger trials are warranted, as SCS may improve LBG and leg rigidity/bradykinesia, especially as time progresses. We reported data for power calculations and identified important risks for designing future trials.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Aarhus University (DK), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble (FR), Bispebjerg Hospital (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (FR), Newcastle University (GB), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus Universitetshospital, Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Pain Management and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.