Abstract DP065: The Road to Heart Transplant Does not Need to be Blocked by Stroke

Introduction: While current guidelines recommend waiting a minimum of 4 weeks for a cardiac transplant following a major ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, there are currently no guidelines to define severity. Here we discuss two case of same-day transplant following acute ischemic stroke. Methods: In this two case series we present adult patients with cardiomyopathy who are pending imminent heart transplant. The first is a 62 year with a bioprosthetic mitral valve repair and ischemic cardiomyopathy (EF 5-10%) hospitalized with worsening heart failure symptoms. On the day of scheduled heart transplant, he developed acute onset left sided numbness and mild left sided weakness (NIHSS 3). CT head was unremarkable, CT angiography head/neck revealed an occlusion of the right distal superior M2 division with increased Tmax in the right parietal lobe (Figure 1). after risk benefit discussions with the cardiac, stroke neurology team, patient and family, he underwent a successful orthotopic heart transplant. There was no neurological worsening after surgery and he was discharged from the hospital several weeks after the heart transplant. The second patient is a 70 year old with ischemic cardiomyopathy admitted for expedited heart transplant evaluation developed acute onset left arm weakness (NIHSS 2). CTH showed a hypodensity in the right temporo-parietal region with increased Tmax and a normal CT angiography of the head/neck (Figure 2). A donor heart became available and after a multidisciplinary discussion, he underwent a cardiac transplant on the same day. A repeat CT head on the following day showed expected evolution of the infarct without hemorrhagic transformation, and also showed small left cerebellar hypodensities concerning for additional infarcts. Discussion: These cases underscore the importance of multidisciplinary risk-benefit discussion when determining whether acute stroke would preclude planned transplant surgery. Conversations will include risk of: 1) additional ischemic stroke in the setting of severely reduced ejection fractions and using LV assistive devices, 2) risk of hemorrhagic transformation of the ischemic stroke when patients are exposed to high doses of systemic heparin during surgery. And 3) risk of alteration in cerebral perfusion during anesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass. Acute stroke should not immediately preclude heart transplant but instead activate a conversation between stroke neurology, cardiology, and cardiac surgery teams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.dp065
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract DP065: The Road to Heart Transplant Does not Need to be Blocked by Stroke

Aleksandra Safonova, Mona N. Bahouth
Stroke
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Abstract DP065: The Road to Heart Transplant Does not Need to be Blocked by Stroke

Aleksandra Safonova, Mona N. Bahouth
article en

Abstract

Introduction: While current guidelines recommend waiting a minimum of 4 weeks for a cardiac transplant following a major ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, there are currently no guidelines to define severity. Here we discuss two case of same-day transplant following acute ischemic stroke. Methods: In this two case series we present adult patients with cardiomyopathy who are pending imminent heart transplant. The first is a 62 year with a bioprosthetic mitral valve repair and ischemic cardiomyopathy (EF 5-10%) hospitalized with worsening heart failure symptoms. On the day of scheduled heart transplant, he developed acute onset left sided numbness and mild left sided weakness (NIHSS 3). CT head was unremarkable, CT angiography head/neck revealed an occlusion of the right distal superior M2 division with increased Tmax in the right parietal lobe (Figure 1). after risk benefit discussions with the cardiac, stroke neurology team, patient and family, he underwent a successful orthotopic heart transplant. There was no neurological worsening after surgery and he was discharged from the hospital several weeks after the heart transplant. The second patient is a 70 year old with ischemic cardiomyopathy admitted for expedited heart transplant evaluation developed acute onset left arm weakness (NIHSS 2). CTH showed a hypodensity in the right temporo-parietal region with increased Tmax and a normal CT angiography of the head/neck (Figure 2). A donor heart became available and after a multidisciplinary discussion, he underwent a cardiac transplant on the same day. A repeat CT head on the following day showed expected evolution of the infarct without hemorrhagic transformation, and also showed small left cerebellar hypodensities concerning for additional infarcts. Discussion: These cases underscore the importance of multidisciplinary risk-benefit discussion when determining whether acute stroke would preclude planned transplant surgery. Conversations will include risk of: 1) additional ischemic stroke in the setting of severely reduced ejection fractions and using LV assistive devices, 2) risk of hemorrhagic transformation of the ischemic stroke when patients are exposed to high doses of systemic heparin during surgery. And 3) risk of alteration in cerebral perfusion during anesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass. Acute stroke should not immediately preclude heart transplant but instead activate a conversation between stroke neurology, cardiology, and cardiac surgery teams.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.