Imaging-Based Quantitative Assessment of Cage Migration After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Posterior cage migration is a clinically relevant complication after lumbar interbody fusion. Most reported risk factors are derived from open techniques, whereas evidence specific to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is limited. We evaluated factors associated with cage migration and symptomatic retropulsion in a large MIS-TLIF cohort. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively reviewed 650 consecutive patients undergoing MIS-TLIF, comprising 1126 fused motion segments. Cage migration was defined as posterior displacement > 3 mm compared with early postoperative radiographs. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and radiographic variables were compared between segments with and without migration. Cases with migration were further stratified by revision requirement. <b>Results</b>: Cage migration occurred in 27 of 1126 levels (2.4%). Seven cases required revision surgery for symptomatic cage retropulsion, corresponding to a level-based incidence of 0.6%. More posterior initial cage placement was significantly associated with subsequent migration. Age, body habitus, smoking, diabetes, endplate violation, and multilevel fusion were not associated with migration. Among migration cases, male sex was associated with higher odds of revision, and no radiographic or mechanical parameter predicted progression from radiographic migration to symptomatic retropulsion. In revision cases, the migrated cage was removed via the original approach, followed by contralateral placement of a new interbody cage using a minimally invasive technique. <b>Conclusions</b>: In this MIS-TLIF cohort, posterior initial cage placement was the primary factor associated with cage migration, consistent with prior open-series findings. Progression from migration to symptomatic retropulsion was not explained by mechanical parameters alone, suggesting a multifactorial process. These findings underscore the importance of meticulous cage positioning during MIS-TLIF and provide practical insights for postoperative surveillance and revision decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031069
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Imaging-Based Quantitative Assessment of Cage Migration After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Lu-Ting Kuo, Ue-Cheung Ho
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
36.00
article

Imaging-Based Quantitative Assessment of Cage Migration After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Lu-Ting Kuo, Ue-Cheung Ho
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Posterior cage migration is a clinically relevant complication after lumbar interbody fusion. Most reported risk factors are derived from open techniques, whereas evidence specific to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is limited. We evaluated factors associated with cage migration and symptomatic retropulsion in a large MIS-TLIF cohort. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively reviewed 650 consecutive patients undergoing MIS-TLIF, comprising 1126 fused motion segments. Cage migration was defined as posterior displacement > 3 mm compared with early postoperative radiographs. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and radiographic variables were compared between segments with and without migration. Cases with migration were further stratified by revision requirement. <b>Results</b>: Cage migration occurred in 27 of 1126 levels (2.4%). Seven cases required revision surgery for symptomatic cage retropulsion, corresponding to a level-based incidence of 0.6%. More posterior initial cage placement was significantly associated with subsequent migration. Age, body habitus, smoking, diabetes, endplate violation, and multilevel fusion were not associated with migration. Among migration cases, male sex was associated with higher odds of revision, and no radiographic or mechanical parameter predicted progression from radiographic migration to symptomatic retropulsion. In revision cases, the migrated cage was removed via the original approach, followed by contralateral placement of a new interbody cage using a minimally invasive technique. <b>Conclusions</b>: In this MIS-TLIF cohort, posterior initial cage placement was the primary factor associated with cage migration, consistent with prior open-series findings. Progression from migration to symptomatic retropulsion was not explained by mechanical parameters alone, suggesting a multifactorial process. These findings underscore the importance of meticulous cage positioning during MIS-TLIF and provide practical insights for postoperative surveillance and revision decision-making.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(3)
National Taiwan University (TW), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
36.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.