Does democracy transfer growth spillovers?

The relationship between democracy and economic growth has been widely debated since the 1980s, yet economists have not reached a consensus on its impact. This study examines this relationship using a spatial econometric approach across 100 countries from 1990 to 2022, incorporating both economic factors and spatial dynamics, such as geographical proximity and democratic context. A key innovation is the concept of institutional proximity, which posits that countries with similar institutional frameworks experience similar economic growth outcomes. The study provides strong evidence of positive growth spillovers from democracy, where democratic governance in one country enhances economic performance in other democratic nations, highlighting the interconnectedness of political and economic systems. Additionally, it uncovers spillover effects in which democratic countries transfer technology to less democratic regions, thus fostering global economic advancement. Notably, these effects extend beyond geographical proximity, with countries such as Australia, New Zealand, and Japan benefiting from democracy’s influence despite being distant from the epicentres of democracy. This challenges the notion that democracy’s impact is geographically confined, demonstrating its potential to drive global growth across national borders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of GIS
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2026.2617188
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does democracy transfer growth spillovers?

Sussane Soretz, Ali Fagheh Majidi
Annals of GIS
Corruption and Economic Development
article

Does democracy transfer growth spillovers?

Sussane Soretz, Ali Fagheh Majidi
article en

Abstract

The relationship between democracy and economic growth has been widely debated since the 1980s, yet economists have not reached a consensus on its impact. This study examines this relationship using a spatial econometric approach across 100 countries from 1990 to 2022, incorporating both economic factors and spatial dynamics, such as geographical proximity and democratic context. A key innovation is the concept of institutional proximity, which posits that countries with similar institutional frameworks experience similar economic growth outcomes. The study provides strong evidence of positive growth spillovers from democracy, where democratic governance in one country enhances economic performance in other democratic nations, highlighting the interconnectedness of political and economic systems. Additionally, it uncovers spillover effects in which democratic countries transfer technology to less democratic regions, thus fostering global economic advancement. Notably, these effects extend beyond geographical proximity, with countries such as Australia, New Zealand, and Japan benefiting from democracy’s influence despite being distant from the epicentres of democracy. This challenges the notion that democracy’s impact is geographically confined, demonstrating its potential to drive global growth across national borders.

Annals of GISVol. 32(1)
University of Kurdistan (IR), Universität Greifswald (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Corruption and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does democracy transfer growth spillovers? — Sussane Soretz, Ali Fagheh Majidi · Annals of GIS (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS