The end of endogamy?:Two centuries of kin marriage in The Netherlands (1812-2021)

Prior research on consanguinity and kin marriage in Western societies has remained surprisingly silent on the postwar period, when kin endogamy is often believed to have become completely obsolete. In this study, we combine historical and contemporary data to chart and understand long durée changes in the incidence of different types of kin marriage in the Netherlands from the 1840s until today. Our study shows that cousin marriages comprised 2.7% of all unions during the 1871-1880 period and decreased to approximately 1.5% during the 1911-1922 period. Sibling set exchange marriages peaked at 4.7% in the last decade of the nineteenth century, after which they declined to 2.8% between 1911-1922. Surprisingly, despite this overall decline, a slight resurgence in sibling set exchange partnerships occurred in the 1970s and 1980s among the members of the baby boom generation. Moreover, cousin marriages saw a slight rise among those born in the 1970s, possibly partly as a result of import marriages among migrant groups. Kinship availability, religious-ideological group formation, and class- and education-based assortative mating explain these different trends, often reinforcing each other, and thereby producing specific spatial patterns of kin marriage. Our findings show that trends and patterns of kin endogamy were highly path-dependent and may wax and wane conditional on historical circumstances.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1408/119356
Primary Topic
Race, Genetics, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The end of endogamy?:Two centuries of kin marriage in The Netherlands (1812-2021)

Vera; id_orcid 0000-0002-0607-6319 de Bel, Hilde; id_orcid 0000-0003-4336-2346 Bras
University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Race, Genetics, and Society
article

The end of endogamy?:Two centuries of kin marriage in The Netherlands (1812-2021)

Vera; id_orcid 0000-0002-0607-6319 de Bel, Hilde; id_orcid 0000-0003-4336-2346 Bras
article en

Abstract

Prior research on consanguinity and kin marriage in Western societies has remained surprisingly silent on the postwar period, when kin endogamy is often believed to have become completely obsolete. In this study, we combine historical and contemporary data to chart and understand long durée changes in the incidence of different types of kin marriage in the Netherlands from the 1840s until today. Our study shows that cousin marriages comprised 2.7% of all unions during the 1871-1880 period and decreased to approximately 1.5% during the 1911-1922 period. Sibling set exchange marriages peaked at 4.7% in the last decade of the nineteenth century, after which they declined to 2.8% between 1911-1922. Surprisingly, despite this overall decline, a slight resurgence in sibling set exchange partnerships occurred in the 1970s and 1980s among the members of the baby boom generation. Moreover, cousin marriages saw a slight rise among those born in the 1970s, possibly partly as a result of import marriages among migrant groups. Kinship availability, religious-ideological group formation, and class- and education-based assortative mating explain these different trends, often reinforcing each other, and thereby producing specific spatial patterns of kin marriage. Our findings show that trends and patterns of kin endogamy were highly path-dependent and may wax and wane conditional on historical circumstances.

University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Race, Genetics, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.