Treatment effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in melanoma correlates with tumor burden: meta-analysis of reported clinical trials

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition (Neo-ICI) in melanoma is an emerging therapeutic strategy that induces pathologic responses with significant prognostic implications for survival. Tumor burden in nonresectable melanoma has a major impact on immunotherapy efficacy, yet little is known on its impact in the Neo-ICI setting. We evaluated the association between tumor burden, measured by the sum of diameters (SoD), and pathological response in melanoma patients treated with Neo-ICI. A meta-analysis of published trials in resectable stage III/IV melanoma was conducted, extracting data on patient characteristics, treatment regimens, pathological response, and survival outcomes. A total of 451 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 47% (95% confidence interval: 35-58%; P < 0.001). Meta-regression demonstrated a significant association between SoD and pCR (moderator = -0.36; P = 0.032), with greater tumor burden associated with lower pCR rates. No significant association was observed between SoD and recurrence-free survival (RFS). This study identifies higher tumor burden as a potential risk factor for lower pathologic response rates to neoadjuvant therapy, underscoring the need to incorporate tumor burden into future clinical research and potentially clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Melanoma Research
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/cmr.0000000000001079
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in melanoma correlates with tumor burden: meta-analysis of reported clinical trials

Anthony P. Tufaro, Lucy Boyce Kennedy, Joseph M. Escandón, Brian Gastman et al.
Melanoma Research
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Treatment effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in melanoma correlates with tumor burden: meta-analysis of reported clinical trials

Anthony P. Tufaro, Lucy Boyce Kennedy, Joseph M. Escandón, Brian Gastman, A. Shen, Yanwen Chen, Jan Joseph Melenhorst, Daniela Duarte-Bateman, James Isaacs, Jennifer Ko
article en

Abstract

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition (Neo-ICI) in melanoma is an emerging therapeutic strategy that induces pathologic responses with significant prognostic implications for survival. Tumor burden in nonresectable melanoma has a major impact on immunotherapy efficacy, yet little is known on its impact in the Neo-ICI setting. We evaluated the association between tumor burden, measured by the sum of diameters (SoD), and pathological response in melanoma patients treated with Neo-ICI. A meta-analysis of published trials in resectable stage III/IV melanoma was conducted, extracting data on patient characteristics, treatment regimens, pathological response, and survival outcomes. A total of 451 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 47% (95% confidence interval: 35-58%; P < 0.001). Meta-regression demonstrated a significant association between SoD and pCR (moderator = -0.36; P = 0.032), with greater tumor burden associated with lower pCR rates. No significant association was observed between SoD and recurrence-free survival (RFS). This study identifies higher tumor burden as a potential risk factor for lower pathologic response rates to neoadjuvant therapy, underscoring the need to incorporate tumor burden into future clinical research and potentially clinical decision-making.

Melanoma ResearchVol. 36(2)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Mayo Clinic (US), WinnMed (US), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.