Study on the Key Factors Controlling Natural Gas Loss at the Boundary Fault of the X1 Gas Storage Facility

Natural gas loss directly threatens the safety and economic viability of underground gas storage (UGS) facilities. The short-term, high-rate cyclic injection and withdrawal processes may cause fault reactivation, resulting in gas loss. Current assessment techniques are mostly concerned with overall storage performance, with few studies focusing on fault-related leakage. This study looks at a UGS facility developed from a difficult fault-block sandstone dry gas resource in China. Focusing on one of its border faults, we develop geological and numerical models to systematically examine the impacts of well-to-fault distance, gas injection rate, and gas withdrawal rate on fault leakage. The results show that numerical simulations can accurately estimate this gas loss. The well-to-fault distance, injection rate, and withdrawal rate are highlighted as critical regulating variables. There is an ideal range for the well-to-fault distance, and altering the injection/withdrawal rates of wells within this range is an effective loss mitigation approach. The crucial distance between injection–production wells and the fault in the X1 gas storage facility is 900 m. Notably, improving the gas withdrawal rate of wells close to the fault considerably minimizes leakage. Reducing the gas injection rate from 11 × 104 m3/d to 7 × 104 m3/d reduces natural gas loss by 353 × 104 m3. Increasing the gas production rate from 9 × 104 m3/d to 29 × 104 m3/d reduces natural gas loss by 975 × 104 m3. The findings provide a scientific basis for assessing and managing natural gas loss at boundary faults in similar UGS plants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14030473
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the Key Factors Controlling Natural Gas Loss at the Boundary Fault of the X1 Gas Storage Facility

J. Liu, Yunhe Su, Li Ou, You Li et al.
Processes
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Study on the Key Factors Controlling Natural Gas Loss at the Boundary Fault of the X1 Gas Storage Facility

J. Liu, Yunhe Su, Li Ou, You Li, Hongcheng Xu, Xin Zheng, Wenjing Zhao, Shujuan Xu, Shang Gao, Guosheng Ding
article en

Abstract

Natural gas loss directly threatens the safety and economic viability of underground gas storage (UGS) facilities. The short-term, high-rate cyclic injection and withdrawal processes may cause fault reactivation, resulting in gas loss. Current assessment techniques are mostly concerned with overall storage performance, with few studies focusing on fault-related leakage. This study looks at a UGS facility developed from a difficult fault-block sandstone dry gas resource in China. Focusing on one of its border faults, we develop geological and numerical models to systematically examine the impacts of well-to-fault distance, gas injection rate, and gas withdrawal rate on fault leakage. The results show that numerical simulations can accurately estimate this gas loss. The well-to-fault distance, injection rate, and withdrawal rate are highlighted as critical regulating variables. There is an ideal range for the well-to-fault distance, and altering the injection/withdrawal rates of wells within this range is an effective loss mitigation approach. The crucial distance between injection–production wells and the fault in the X1 gas storage facility is 900 m. Notably, improving the gas withdrawal rate of wells close to the fault considerably minimizes leakage. Reducing the gas injection rate from 11 × 104 m3/d to 7 × 104 m3/d reduces natural gas loss by 353 × 104 m3. Increasing the gas production rate from 9 × 104 m3/d to 29 × 104 m3/d reduces natural gas loss by 975 × 104 m3. The findings provide a scientific basis for assessing and managing natural gas loss at boundary faults in similar UGS plants.

ProcessesVol. 14(3)
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (CN), China National Petroleum Corporation (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.