Reference Values for Myocardial Strain by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking: Insights From Healthy Volunteers and Heart Failure Patients Using Caas MR

Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of left ventricular myocardial strain using Caas MR Strain software reliably identifies HF patients. Discrimination between the different HF entities is potentially feasible by GLS, GCS, and GRS. Intervendor agreement was most robust for GLS and GCS, but less robust for GRS. For practical clinical use, we propose cut-off values for GLS above -15%, GCS above -15%, and GRS below 23% to define pathological findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/rcm41521
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reference Values for Myocardial Strain by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking: Insights From Healthy Volunteers and Heart Failure Patients Using Caas MR

Karina Sánchez Carrizósa, Stefanie Maria Werhahn, Karl Jakob Weiß, Moritz Blum et al.
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Reference Values for Myocardial Strain by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking: Insights From Healthy Volunteers and Heart Failure Patients Using Caas MR

Karina Sánchez Carrizósa, Stefanie Maria Werhahn, Karl Jakob Weiß, Moritz Blum, Jana Veit, Christian Stehning, Gaston Vogel, Shing Ching, Rebecca Elisabeth Beyer, Patrick Doeblin, Irene Carrión Sánchez, Djawid Hashemi, Radu Tanacli, Hans-Dirk Düngen, Sebastian Kelle, Nicole Mittmann
article en

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of left ventricular myocardial strain using Caas MR Strain software reliably identifies HF patients. Discrimination between the different HF entities is potentially feasible by GLS, GCS, and GRS. Intervendor agreement was most robust for GLS and GCS, but less robust for GRS. For practical clinical use, we propose cut-off values for GLS above -15%, GCS above -15%, and GRS below 23% to define pathological findings.

Reviews in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 27(1)
Instituto Cajal (ES), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), United Christian Hospital (CN), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES), Philips (Germany) (DE)
Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislaufforschung, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.