Computational Fluid Dynamics for Direct Methanol, Direct Formic Acid, and Alkaline Fuel Cells: Comparison the Net Power with Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

Different types of fuel cells are studied in order to clarify the best application for each type. The current paper includes a comparative research of basic design, working principle, applications, advantages and disadvantages of various technologies available for fuel cells, experimentally. In this work, the overall diffusion layer thickness was evaluated based on the measured catalyst layer thickness and plain carbon cloth technical data. The voltages/current characteristics were first acquired for the lowest concentration around 0.1 to 0.2 M for DMFC, PEMFC, and DFAFC. In the case of DFAFC, the increase in FA concentration from 0.1, 0.2, 1 M enhanced the DFAFC power densities. In the case of DFAFC 2.0 M, the increase in the concentration caused an increasing in power densities, possibly related to the enhanced crossover of the fuel. The AFC exhibited almost the highest operating efficiency compared with DMFC and DFAFC. There for the performance sequencing of these fuel cells based on their power densities can be resulted as follows AFC > DFAFC > DMFC > PEMFC. It was also discussed that although all types of fuel cells operate on similar basis; Alkaline is the most efficient (75%), followed by Direct formic acid (DFAFC) (50%) and Direct Methanol (DMFC) (40%) in terms of power efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1990793125701118
Primary Topic
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational Fluid Dynamics for Direct Methanol, Direct Formic Acid, and Alkaline Fuel Cells: Comparison the Net Power with Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

Majid Monajjemi, F. Mollaamin, Sara Shahriari, P. Gilandoust et al.
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
article

Computational Fluid Dynamics for Direct Methanol, Direct Formic Acid, and Alkaline Fuel Cells: Comparison the Net Power with Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

Majid Monajjemi, F. Mollaamin, Sara Shahriari, P. Gilandoust, M. Amerian, Y. Shahverdy, S. Mohammadi, P. Moeni
article en

Abstract

Different types of fuel cells are studied in order to clarify the best application for each type. The current paper includes a comparative research of basic design, working principle, applications, advantages and disadvantages of various technologies available for fuel cells, experimentally. In this work, the overall diffusion layer thickness was evaluated based on the measured catalyst layer thickness and plain carbon cloth technical data. The voltages/current characteristics were first acquired for the lowest concentration around 0.1 to 0.2 M for DMFC, PEMFC, and DFAFC. In the case of DFAFC, the increase in FA concentration from 0.1, 0.2, 1 M enhanced the DFAFC power densities. In the case of DFAFC 2.0 M, the increase in the concentration caused an increasing in power densities, possibly related to the enhanced crossover of the fuel. The AFC exhibited almost the highest operating efficiency compared with DMFC and DFAFC. There for the performance sequencing of these fuel cells based on their power densities can be resulted as follows AFC > DFAFC > DMFC > PEMFC. It was also discussed that although all types of fuel cells operate on similar basis; Alkaline is the most efficient (75%), followed by Direct formic acid (DFAFC) (50%) and Direct Methanol (DMFC) (40%) in terms of power efficiency.

Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry BVol. 19(6)
Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch (IR), Kastamonu University (TR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.