Abstract DP187: Changes in stroke care regionalization in California associated with evolving evidence for endovascular thrombectomy: A network analysis

Background: Since the 2015 publication of benefit for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), hospitals have worked to transfer eligible patients to EVT-capable sites. These interhospital patient transfers lead to naturally forming clusters of hospitals that are more closely connected to one another through patient transfers than they are to other hospitals. Our objective was to investigate related changes in regionalization of stroke care reflected in the organization of stroke patient transfer networks and hospital clusters. We hypothesized that after the 2015 publication of benefits for EVT, stroke care became increasingly regionalized, with hospitals consolidated into fewer clusters centered around EVT-capable sites. Methods: We used comprehensive statewide data from California to create the network of all ischemic stroke transfers from 2010-2021. We applied network analysis strategies and used block models to identify clusters of closely connected hospitals in the transfer network. We examined changes in network characteristics over time, including the number of hospital clusters and clusters’ EVT capability (defined by presence of a hospital performing at least 2 EVT procedures in a given year). Results: We identified 19,244 transfers among 338 hospitals. The number of hospital clusters and the number of clusters with at least one EVT-capable hospital increased over time (Figures 1 and 2). The proportion of receiving hospitals with EVT-capability increased from 20.2% (43/213) to 34.1% (71/208) after 2015. EVT-capable hospitals consistently received more patients in transfer relative to non-capable hospitals (mean in-degree per year pre-2015: 15.1 vs. 3.3 and post-2015, 22.1 vs. 2.4 among EVT- and non-EVT-capable hospitals respectively). Within each cluster, the average proportion of patients that received EVT also increased (Figure 3). Conclusions: From 2010 to 2021, regionalization of stroke care in California reorganized, with an increase in EVT-capable hospitals and corresponding increase in hospital clusters around these hospitals. These changes were associated with increased performance of EVT among transferred ischemic stroke patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.dp187
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract DP187: Changes in stroke care regionalization in California associated with evolving evidence for endovascular thrombectomy: A network analysis

J.P. Onnela, Carlos Henrique Ferreira Camargo, Renee Yuen-Jan Hsia, Mathew Reeves et al.
Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Abstract DP187: Changes in stroke care regionalization in California associated with evolving evidence for endovascular thrombectomy: A network analysis

J.P. Onnela, Carlos Henrique Ferreira Camargo, Renee Yuen-Jan Hsia, Mathew Reeves, Kori Sauser Zachrison, Vicki Fung, Margaret Samuels-Kalow, Yuhua Zhang, Lee Schwamm
article en

Abstract

Background: Since the 2015 publication of benefit for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), hospitals have worked to transfer eligible patients to EVT-capable sites. These interhospital patient transfers lead to naturally forming clusters of hospitals that are more closely connected to one another through patient transfers than they are to other hospitals. Our objective was to investigate related changes in regionalization of stroke care reflected in the organization of stroke patient transfer networks and hospital clusters. We hypothesized that after the 2015 publication of benefits for EVT, stroke care became increasingly regionalized, with hospitals consolidated into fewer clusters centered around EVT-capable sites. Methods: We used comprehensive statewide data from California to create the network of all ischemic stroke transfers from 2010-2021. We applied network analysis strategies and used block models to identify clusters of closely connected hospitals in the transfer network. We examined changes in network characteristics over time, including the number of hospital clusters and clusters’ EVT capability (defined by presence of a hospital performing at least 2 EVT procedures in a given year). Results: We identified 19,244 transfers among 338 hospitals. The number of hospital clusters and the number of clusters with at least one EVT-capable hospital increased over time (Figures 1 and 2). The proportion of receiving hospitals with EVT-capability increased from 20.2% (43/213) to 34.1% (71/208) after 2015. EVT-capable hospitals consistently received more patients in transfer relative to non-capable hospitals (mean in-degree per year pre-2015: 15.1 vs. 3.3 and post-2015, 22.1 vs. 2.4 among EVT- and non-EVT-capable hospitals respectively). Within each cluster, the average proportion of patients that received EVT also increased (Figure 3). Conclusions: From 2010 to 2021, regionalization of stroke care in California reorganized, with an increase in EVT-capable hospitals and corresponding increase in hospital clusters around these hospitals. These changes were associated with increased performance of EVT among transferred ischemic stroke patients.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Harvard University (US), City College of San Francisco (US), Yale University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Michigan United (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.