Predictive and Prognostic Performance of the Phoenix Sepsis Criteria and Phoenix Sepsis Score in PICU Patients With Suspected Infection: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Objectives: Evaluate the predictive and prognostic performance of the Phoenix Sepsis Criteria (PSC) and Phoenix Sepsis Score (PSS) compared with International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference (IPSCC) criteria and other organ dysfunction scores in children admitted to the PICU with suspected infection. Design: Multicenter, prospective cohort study. Setting: Eight PICUs within the Italian Network of PICU Study Group (TIPNet). Patients: Patients younger than 18 years admitted with suspected infection (from February 2022 to April 2024). Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Vital signs, organ dysfunction markers, and organ support requirements were collected during day 1 and day 2 of PICU admission. Sepsis was assessed using IPSCC criteria and PSC. IPSCC Severe Sepsis, PSS, Phoenix-8, Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2), pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Pediatric Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score were calculated as organ dysfunction scores. Sepsis criteria predictive performance was assessed using sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Organ dysfunction scores prognostic performance was assessed using the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Primary outcome was PICU mortality. Among 687 patients, PSC showed higher predictive performance than IPSCC sepsis criteria, with improved sensitivity and PPV for mortality on day 1 (PSC: sensitivity, 96.4%; 95% CI, 95.0–97.8%; PPV, 7.6%; 95% CI, 5.6–9.6% and IPSCC: sensitivity, 82.1%; 95% CI, 79.3–85.0%; PPV, 6.2%; 95% CI, 4.4–8.0%) and day 2 (PSC: sensitivity, 100.0%; 95% CI, 100.0–100.0%; PPV, 10.0%; 95% CI, 7.6–12.5% and IPSCC: sensitivity, 75.0%; 95% CI, 71.5–78.5%; PPV, 9.0%; 95% CI, 6.7–11.3%). PELOD-2 exhibited the highest AUPRC for mortality (day 1, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26–0.63 and day 2, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38–0.77). IPSCC Severe Sepsis score was outperformed by all other organ dysfunction scores, including PSS and Phoenix-8. All prognostic performances improved from day 1 to day 2. Conclusions: PSC and PSS performed superior to IPSCC criteria in diagnosing and prognosticating pediatric sepsis, with improved performance at day 2 of PICU admission. This study first validated PSC and PSS in a European cohort.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2026-01-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-283337
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive and Prognostic Performance of the Phoenix Sepsis Criteria and Phoenix Sepsis Score in PICU Patients With Suspected Infection: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Davide Padrin, Luca Marchetto, Enzo Picconi, Giulia Bordin et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Predictive and Prognostic Performance of the Phoenix Sepsis Criteria and Phoenix Sepsis Score in PICU Patients With Suspected Infection: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Davide Padrin, Luca Marchetto, Enzo Picconi, Giulia Bordin, Immacolata Rulli, Serena Scaravetti, M. Daverio, Gloria Brigiari, Dario Gregori, Kusum Menon, Francesco Sacco, Maria Cristina Mondardini, Angela Amigoni, for the Italian Network of PICU Study Group (TIPNet), Pasquale Vitale, Rosanna Comoretto, Luregn Schlapbach
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluate the predictive and prognostic performance of the Phoenix Sepsis Criteria (PSC) and Phoenix Sepsis Score (PSS) compared with International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference (IPSCC) criteria and other organ dysfunction scores in children admitted to the PICU with suspected infection. Design: Multicenter, prospective cohort study. Setting: Eight PICUs within the Italian Network of PICU Study Group (TIPNet). Patients: Patients younger than 18 years admitted with suspected infection (from February 2022 to April 2024). Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Vital signs, organ dysfunction markers, and organ support requirements were collected during day 1 and day 2 of PICU admission. Sepsis was assessed using IPSCC criteria and PSC. IPSCC Severe Sepsis, PSS, Phoenix-8, Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2), pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Pediatric Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score were calculated as organ dysfunction scores. Sepsis criteria predictive performance was assessed using sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Organ dysfunction scores prognostic performance was assessed using the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Primary outcome was PICU mortality. Among 687 patients, PSC showed higher predictive performance than IPSCC sepsis criteria, with improved sensitivity and PPV for mortality on day 1 (PSC: sensitivity, 96.4%; 95% CI, 95.0–97.8%; PPV, 7.6%; 95% CI, 5.6–9.6% and IPSCC: sensitivity, 82.1%; 95% CI, 79.3–85.0%; PPV, 6.2%; 95% CI, 4.4–8.0%) and day 2 (PSC: sensitivity, 100.0%; 95% CI, 100.0–100.0%; PPV, 10.0%; 95% CI, 7.6–12.5% and IPSCC: sensitivity, 75.0%; 95% CI, 71.5–78.5%; PPV, 9.0%; 95% CI, 6.7–11.3%). PELOD-2 exhibited the highest AUPRC for mortality (day 1, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26–0.63 and day 2, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38–0.77). IPSCC Severe Sepsis score was outperformed by all other organ dysfunction scores, including PSS and Phoenix-8. All prognostic performances improved from day 1 to day 2. Conclusions: PSC and PSS performed superior to IPSCC criteria in diagnosing and prognosticating pediatric sepsis, with improved performance at day 2 of PICU admission. This study first validated PSC and PSS in a European cohort.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.