Benchmarking deep learning models for predicting anticancer drug potency (IC50) with insights for medicinal chemists

Potency (IC<sub>50</sub>) prediction of small molecules is pivotal for anticancer drug development. This study benchmarked five deep learning (DL) models for IC<sub>50</sub> prediction-DeepCDR, DrugCell, PaccMann, Precily, and tCNN-against a simple mean-based Baseline using standardized GDSC datasets and recently published anticancer compounds. To ensure practicality, conventional error metrics were supplemented with percentage error, log error, three-sigma limit, and a newly proposed Experimental Variability-Aware Prediction Accuracy statistic. The models performed well on randomly split data and unseen cell lines but showed sharply reduced accuracy for unseen compounds. Though all DL models exhibited similar performance trends, DeepCDR, DrugCell, and tCNN held a slight edge in most testing scenarios. Interestingly, several DL algorithms could not significantly outperform the Baseline model in many tests. Assessing prediction error against physicochemical and biological properties of compounds and cell lines revealed weak correlation, highlighting an underexplored aspect of model performance. A user-friendly web server ( https://nlplab1.isical.ac.in/ic50.php ) was also developed for IC<sub>50</sub> prediction of new compounds against cancer cell lines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Chemistry
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-026-01916-9
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking deep learning models for predicting anticancer drug potency (IC50) with insights for medicinal chemists

Arun K. Pal, Utpal Garain, Deepak B. Salunke, Koyel Ghosh et al.
Communications Chemistry
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Benchmarking deep learning models for predicting anticancer drug potency (IC50) with insights for medicinal chemists

Arun K. Pal, Utpal Garain, Deepak B. Salunke, Koyel Ghosh, Udbhas Garai
article en

Abstract

Potency (IC<sub>50</sub>) prediction of small molecules is pivotal for anticancer drug development. This study benchmarked five deep learning (DL) models for IC<sub>50</sub> prediction-DeepCDR, DrugCell, PaccMann, Precily, and tCNN-against a simple mean-based Baseline using standardized GDSC datasets and recently published anticancer compounds. To ensure practicality, conventional error metrics were supplemented with percentage error, log error, three-sigma limit, and a newly proposed Experimental Variability-Aware Prediction Accuracy statistic. The models performed well on randomly split data and unseen cell lines but showed sharply reduced accuracy for unseen compounds. Though all DL models exhibited similar performance trends, DeepCDR, DrugCell, and tCNN held a slight edge in most testing scenarios. Interestingly, several DL algorithms could not significantly outperform the Baseline model in many tests. Assessing prediction error against physicochemical and biological properties of compounds and cell lines revealed weak correlation, highlighting an underexplored aspect of model performance. A user-friendly web server ( https://nlplab1.isical.ac.in/ic50.php ) was also developed for IC<sub>50</sub> prediction of new compounds against cancer cell lines.

Communications ChemistryVol. 9(1)
SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN), Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali (IN), National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (IN), Indian Statistical Institute (IN)
Indian Statistical Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.