Key crops for processed foods have spatially variable biodiversity impacts not captured in other environmental impact indicators

We must urgently address unsustainable food system practices to protect important ecosystems. Most research quantifying the environmental impacts of food production and consumption has not measured biodiversity impacts directly or spatially, limiting our ability to evaluate how producing and consuming countries are contributing to food system sustainability. Here, we quantify the biodiversity impacts of food crops commonly found in processed foods using a range of accessible metrics. We focus on ingredients found in popular processed foods, such as chocolate digestive biscuits, and show globally reaching impacts. Land-use and fertiliser impacts were greatest for the food crops considered. We also identified Critically Endangered species at risk from habitat loss associated with crops being supplied to the UK specifically. For instance, cocoa production overlaps with nearly 20% of the range of both the Critically Endangered Roloway and Miss Waldron’s Red Colobus monkeys. As crop-specific farm and trade data are not publicly available, it is difficult to know the origin of all ingredients, limiting biodiversity impact estimation. If such data are released in future, our approach can be used to further evaluate biodiversity impacts of foods to inform more sustainable decision-making at consumer, business, and government levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34850-2
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key crops for processed foods have spatially variable biodiversity impacts not captured in other environmental impact indicators

Charlotte L. Outhwaite, Amy Molotoks, Adam Chapman, Felicitas Pamatat et al.
Scientific Reports
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Key crops for processed foods have spatially variable biodiversity impacts not captured in other environmental impact indicators

Charlotte L. Outhwaite, Amy Molotoks, Adam Chapman, Felicitas Pamatat, Carole Dalin, Mark Jwaideh
article en

Abstract

We must urgently address unsustainable food system practices to protect important ecosystems. Most research quantifying the environmental impacts of food production and consumption has not measured biodiversity impacts directly or spatially, limiting our ability to evaluate how producing and consuming countries are contributing to food system sustainability. Here, we quantify the biodiversity impacts of food crops commonly found in processed foods using a range of accessible metrics. We focus on ingredients found in popular processed foods, such as chocolate digestive biscuits, and show globally reaching impacts. Land-use and fertiliser impacts were greatest for the food crops considered. We also identified Critically Endangered species at risk from habitat loss associated with crops being supplied to the UK specifically. For instance, cocoa production overlaps with nearly 20% of the range of both the Critically Endangered Roloway and Miss Waldron’s Red Colobus monkeys. As crop-specific farm and trade data are not publicly available, it is difficult to know the origin of all ingredients, limiting biodiversity impact estimation. If such data are released in future, our approach can be used to further evaluate biodiversity impacts of foods to inform more sustainable decision-making at consumer, business, and government levels.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Zoological Society of London (GB), Energy Institute (GB), Stockholm Environment Institute (GB), University of Aberdeen (GB), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), University of Oxford (GB), École Normale Supérieure (BI), Laboratoire de Géologie de l’École Normale Supérieure (FR), University College London (GB), University of York (GB)
Wellcome Trust, European Commission, Natural Environment Research Council, Research England
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.