The Morality of Incentivising Organ Donations from Prisoners

Any programme that runs the risk of mistreating already-marginalized persons deserves significant moral scrutiny. So, when a proposal was put forth in the Massachusetts state legislature that would incentivise organ donations from prisoners, it was quite reasonable for the initial reaction to be against the proposal. However, does this initial reaction survive moral analysis? In this paper, I argue that it can be morally permissible to implement programmes that incentivise organ donations from prisoners. I reach this conclusion by considering eight objections against this proposal, offering three reasons in favour of it, and then giving three guidelines for the permissible implementation of these programmes. Still, I conclude that the permissible implementation of these programmes would need to also include the input of many others, including prisoners and those who advocate for them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The New Bioethics
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2025.2610916
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Morality of Incentivising Organ Donations from Prisoners

Timothy Kirschenheiter
The New Bioethics
Organ Donation and Transplantation
article

The Morality of Incentivising Organ Donations from Prisoners

Timothy Kirschenheiter
article en

Abstract

Any programme that runs the risk of mistreating already-marginalized persons deserves significant moral scrutiny. So, when a proposal was put forth in the Massachusetts state legislature that would incentivise organ donations from prisoners, it was quite reasonable for the initial reaction to be against the proposal. However, does this initial reaction survive moral analysis? In this paper, I argue that it can be morally permissible to implement programmes that incentivise organ donations from prisoners. I reach this conclusion by considering eight objections against this proposal, offering three reasons in favour of it, and then giving three guidelines for the permissible implementation of these programmes. Still, I conclude that the permissible implementation of these programmes would need to also include the input of many others, including prisoners and those who advocate for them.

The New BioethicsVol. 32(1)
Oakland University (US), University of Michigan–Dearborn (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Morality of Incentivising Organ Donations from Prisoners — Timothy Kirschenheiter · The New Bioethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS