Abstract WP180: Statewide Survey of Prehospital Stroke Screening Practices Among EMS Providers in Texas

Intro: 2024 GWTG data shows low rates of stroke screening (31%), severity tool performance (18%), and prehospital notification (52%) in Texas. To assess current practices, the Texas Governor’s EMS and Trauma Advisory Council, in collaboration with the Dept of State Health Services (DSHS), conducted a statewide EMS survey. Methods: A REDCap survey was distributed statewide (Oct 2024–Jan 2025) via DSHS email lists for registered EMS providers, assessing practice setting, documentation, stroke screening tool utilization, confidence, training, and pre-notification. Results: Of 189 respondents, 147 (78%) completed and 42 (22%) partially completed the survey. Respondents included paramedics (73%), EMTs (9%), RNs (9%), AEMTs (6%), and EMS medical directors (7%); 71% reported leadership roles. Practice settings were rural (44%), urban (28%),&suburban (28%), spanning 14/22 Trauma Service Areas (29% from TSA-E). Most reported using electronic patient care record (96%). Stroke screening: 152 (98%) reported being instructed to use a tool. The most frequently cited were CPSS (86%) and FAST (43%). Performance confidence was high: very confident (58%), confident (36%), somewhat confident (5%), not confident (2%). Training occurred yearly (40%), more than once yearly (27%), or less often (33%). Stroke screening was reported as performed in >75% of suspected cases by (68%), with smaller proportions reporting less consistent use. LVO screening adoption was less widespread. 104 (68%) were instructed to use an LVO tool. Most common tools included VAN (51%), C-STAT (19%). Confidence was lower than standard screening: very confident (47%), confident (35%), somewhat confident (18%), and not confident (1). Training was annual (43%) or more frequent (25%), but 11 reported only one exposure or no training. In practice, 51% reported LVO tools used in >75% of suspected cases, but 21% used them <25% of the time&2 never. Hospital pre-notification was frequent, with >75% reported by 80%. Documentation was via structured fields (59%) or narrative notes (41%). Leadership and non-leadership respondents reported similar overall tool use and pre-arrival notification rates. Conclusions: Texas EMS providers report utilizing prehospital stroke screening. Confidence is high, and hospital pre-notification is reported as consistently practiced. However, variability in training and documentation persists. LVO tool adoption is moderate, with lower confidence, less frequent training, and less use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.wp180
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract WP180: Statewide Survey of Prehospital Stroke Screening Practices Among EMS Providers in Texas

Alan Tyroch, Rachel Aubert, Jorie Klein, Joseph W. Schmider et al.
Stroke
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Abstract WP180: Statewide Survey of Prehospital Stroke Screening Practices Among EMS Providers in Texas

Alan Tyroch, Rachel Aubert, Jorie Klein, Joseph W. Schmider, Sava Novakovic, Elizabeth Fagan, Robin Novakovic-White, Elizabeth K. Stevenson, Christopher Winckler, Hira Pervez
article en

Abstract

Intro: 2024 GWTG data shows low rates of stroke screening (31%), severity tool performance (18%), and prehospital notification (52%) in Texas. To assess current practices, the Texas Governor’s EMS and Trauma Advisory Council, in collaboration with the Dept of State Health Services (DSHS), conducted a statewide EMS survey. Methods: A REDCap survey was distributed statewide (Oct 2024–Jan 2025) via DSHS email lists for registered EMS providers, assessing practice setting, documentation, stroke screening tool utilization, confidence, training, and pre-notification. Results: Of 189 respondents, 147 (78%) completed and 42 (22%) partially completed the survey. Respondents included paramedics (73%), EMTs (9%), RNs (9%), AEMTs (6%), and EMS medical directors (7%); 71% reported leadership roles. Practice settings were rural (44%), urban (28%),&suburban (28%), spanning 14/22 Trauma Service Areas (29% from TSA-E). Most reported using electronic patient care record (96%). Stroke screening: 152 (98%) reported being instructed to use a tool. The most frequently cited were CPSS (86%) and FAST (43%). Performance confidence was high: very confident (58%), confident (36%), somewhat confident (5%), not confident (2%). Training occurred yearly (40%), more than once yearly (27%), or less often (33%). Stroke screening was reported as performed in >75% of suspected cases by (68%), with smaller proportions reporting less consistent use. LVO screening adoption was less widespread. 104 (68%) were instructed to use an LVO tool. Most common tools included VAN (51%), C-STAT (19%). Confidence was lower than standard screening: very confident (47%), confident (35%), somewhat confident (18%), and not confident (1). Training was annual (43%) or more frequent (25%), but 11 reported only one exposure or no training. In practice, 51% reported LVO tools used in >75% of suspected cases, but 21% used them <25% of the time&2 never. Hospital pre-notification was frequent, with >75% reported by 80%. Documentation was via structured fields (59%) or narrative notes (41%). Leadership and non-leadership respondents reported similar overall tool use and pre-arrival notification rates. Conclusions: Texas EMS providers report utilizing prehospital stroke screening. Confidence is high, and hospital pre-notification is reported as consistently practiced. However, variability in training and documentation persists. LVO tool adoption is moderate, with lower confidence, less frequent training, and less use.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
The University of Texas at El Paso (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Digestive Health Associates of Texas (US), Baylor Scott & White Health (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.