Abstract WP180: Statewide Survey of Prehospital Stroke Screening Practices Among EMS Providers in Texas
Intro: 2024 GWTG data shows low rates of stroke screening (31%), severity tool performance (18%), and prehospital notification (52%) in Texas. To assess current practices, the Texas Governor’s EMS and Trauma Advisory Council, in collaboration with the Dept of State Health Services (DSHS), conducted a statewide EMS survey. Methods: A REDCap survey was distributed statewide (Oct 2024–Jan 2025) via DSHS email lists for registered EMS providers, assessing practice setting, documentation, stroke screening tool utilization, confidence, training, and pre-notification. Results: Of 189 respondents, 147 (78%) completed and 42 (22%) partially completed the survey. Respondents included paramedics (73%), EMTs (9%), RNs (9%), AEMTs (6%), and EMS medical directors (7%); 71% reported leadership roles. Practice settings were rural (44%), urban (28%),&suburban (28%), spanning 14/22 Trauma Service Areas (29% from TSA-E). Most reported using electronic patient care record (96%). Stroke screening: 152 (98%) reported being instructed to use a tool. The most frequently cited were CPSS (86%) and FAST (43%). Performance confidence was high: very confident (58%), confident (36%), somewhat confident (5%), not confident (2%). Training occurred yearly (40%), more than once yearly (27%), or less often (33%). Stroke screening was reported as performed in >75% of suspected cases by (68%), with smaller proportions reporting less consistent use. LVO screening adoption was less widespread. 104 (68%) were instructed to use an LVO tool. Most common tools included VAN (51%), C-STAT (19%). Confidence was lower than standard screening: very confident (47%), confident (35%), somewhat confident (18%), and not confident (1). Training was annual (43%) or more frequent (25%), but 11 reported only one exposure or no training. In practice, 51% reported LVO tools used in >75% of suspected cases, but 21% used them <25% of the time&2 never. Hospital pre-notification was frequent, with >75% reported by 80%. Documentation was via structured fields (59%) or narrative notes (41%). Leadership and non-leadership respondents reported similar overall tool use and pre-arrival notification rates. Conclusions: Texas EMS providers report utilizing prehospital stroke screening. Confidence is high, and hospital pre-notification is reported as consistently practiced. However, variability in training and documentation persists. LVO tool adoption is moderate, with lower confidence, less frequent training, and less use.
Authors
- Alan Tyroch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0172-5711)
- Rachel Aubert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6267-3687)
- Jorie Klein
- Joseph W. Schmider
- Sava Novakovic (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-4282)
- Elizabeth Fagan
- Robin Novakovic-White
- Elizabeth K. Stevenson
- Christopher Winckler
- Hira Pervez
Institutions
- The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Digestive Health Associates of Texas (US)
- Baylor Scott & White Health (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Stroke
- Published
- 2026-01-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.wp180
- Primary Topic
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00