Developing the LIFE Monitor to Assess Fidelity of MULTI+ for Inpatients with Mental Illness

Abstract The extent to which an intervention is implemented as intended (i.e., fidelity) is rarely measured in complex lifestyle interventions, despite its importance for both internal and external validity. Creating and using fidelity measures can be complex and resource intensive. This study describes the development of the Lifestyle Implementation, Fidelity and Execution Monitor (LIFE Monitor), created for MULTI+, a multidisciplinary lifestyle-focused approach in treatment for people with mental illness. The overall study in which the LIFE Monitor was developed is an open cohort stepped wedge study. We established item objectives for 10 core components (i.e., essential elements of an intervention), and conducted item calibration (i.e., rating items on a gradient). We assessed fidelity through structured observations of 43 items. We investigated inter-rater reliability, item-level agreement, internal consistency and construct validity. The LIFE Monitor demonstrated sufficient inter-rater reliability, though there was high variability in agreement between coders. Internal consistency was generally low within core components, reflecting the multifaced nature of MULTI+. Although implementation duration was not statistically significantly associated with fidelity scores, the variability across clusters suggests that the LIFE Monitor captures the complexities of real-world implementation and has potential beyond research. This study provides practical guidance for developing fidelity measures for complex interventions. While the LIFE monitor requires further refinement, it shows promise as a pragmatic tool for monitoring in both research and clinical settings, including progress mapping and implementation guidance. ClinicalTrials.gov registration . Identifier: NCT04922749. Retrospectively registered June 3, 2021.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Implementation Research and Applications
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-025-00201-6
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing the LIFE Monitor to Assess Fidelity of MULTI+ for Inpatients with Mental Illness

Wiepke Cahn, Prof. Nanne K. de Vries, Jeroen Deenik, Natascha M den Bleijker et al.
Global Implementation Research and Applications
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Developing the LIFE Monitor to Assess Fidelity of MULTI+ for Inpatients with Mental Illness

Wiepke Cahn, Prof. Nanne K. de Vries, Jeroen Deenik, Natascha M den Bleijker, Myrthe ME van Schothorst, Peter N. van Harten, Ingrid J. M. Hendriksen
article en

Abstract

Abstract The extent to which an intervention is implemented as intended (i.e., fidelity) is rarely measured in complex lifestyle interventions, despite its importance for both internal and external validity. Creating and using fidelity measures can be complex and resource intensive. This study describes the development of the Lifestyle Implementation, Fidelity and Execution Monitor (LIFE Monitor), created for MULTI+, a multidisciplinary lifestyle-focused approach in treatment for people with mental illness. The overall study in which the LIFE Monitor was developed is an open cohort stepped wedge study. We established item objectives for 10 core components (i.e., essential elements of an intervention), and conducted item calibration (i.e., rating items on a gradient). We assessed fidelity through structured observations of 43 items. We investigated inter-rater reliability, item-level agreement, internal consistency and construct validity. The LIFE Monitor demonstrated sufficient inter-rater reliability, though there was high variability in agreement between coders. Internal consistency was generally low within core components, reflecting the multifaced nature of MULTI+. Although implementation duration was not statistically significantly associated with fidelity scores, the variability across clusters suggests that the LIFE Monitor captures the complexities of real-world implementation and has potential beyond research. This study provides practical guidance for developing fidelity measures for complex interventions. While the LIFE monitor requires further refinement, it shows promise as a pragmatic tool for monitoring in both research and clinical settings, including progress mapping and implementation guidance. ClinicalTrials.gov registration . Identifier: NCT04922749. Retrospectively registered June 3, 2021.

Global Implementation Research and Applications
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Developing the LIFE Monitor to Assess Fidelity of MULTI+ for Inpatients with Mental Illness — Wiepke Cahn, Prof. Nanne K. de Vries, et al. · Global Implementation Research and Applications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS