Abstract WP028: Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase Across Different Treatment Time Windows: A Monocentric One-Year Stroke Center Experience

Introduction: Tenecteplase (TNK) offers pharmacological advantages over alteplase (rt-PA) and is increasingly adopted as the primary thrombolytic agent for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Our tertiary-care stroke center transitioned from rt-PA to TNK in June 2024, enabling real-world evaluation across conventional and extended treatment time windows. This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety outcomes one year before and after transition. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our institutional stroke registry, including all AIS patients treated with IVT one year before (rt-PA: June 2023–May 2024) and one year after transition (TNK: June 2024–May 2025). IVT was analyzed in both the conventional (≤4.5h) and extended (>4.5h) treatment windows, as well as in off-label scenarios such as treatment under oral anticoagulation (OAC). Primary endpoints included treatment metrics (door-to-needle [DTN], imaging-to-needle, door-to-groin, and door-to-recanalization times). Safety endpoints comprised any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH (sICH; SITS-MOST). Results: A total of 591 patients received IVT (rt-PA: n=278; TNK: n=313), 69% within ≤4.5h and 31% beyond 4.5h. DTN times were significantly shorter with TNK compared to rt-PA (31 min [IQR 22–48] vs. 35 min [26–54]; p=0.002), driven by reduced imaging-to-needle times (12 min [7–25] vs. 16 min [9–29]; p<0.001). Safety outcomes showed no significant differences between TNK and rt-PA – neither overall (any ICH: 8% vs. 7%, p=0.12; sICH [SITS-MOST]: 1% vs. 1%, p=0.75) nor across different treatment windows and off-label scenarios such as IVT under OAC. Conclusion: In this large, real-world, one-year cohort comparison, transitioning from rt-PA to TNK improved treatment efficiency while maintaining comparable safety. TNK proved feasible and safe not only within the conventional window but also beyond 4.5 hours and in selected off-label scenarios, supporting its role as a first-line thrombolytic agent in routine stroke care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.wp028
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract WP028: Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase Across Different Treatment Time Windows: A Monocentric One-Year Stroke Center Experience

Anna Bogdanova, S. T. Gerner, Tobias Engelhorn, Stefan Schwab et al.
Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Abstract WP028: Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase Across Different Treatment Time Windows: A Monocentric One-Year Stroke Center Experience

Anna Bogdanova, S. T. Gerner, Tobias Engelhorn, Stefan Schwab, Singer L, Alexander Sekita, Lena Mers
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Tenecteplase (TNK) offers pharmacological advantages over alteplase (rt-PA) and is increasingly adopted as the primary thrombolytic agent for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Our tertiary-care stroke center transitioned from rt-PA to TNK in June 2024, enabling real-world evaluation across conventional and extended treatment time windows. This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety outcomes one year before and after transition. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our institutional stroke registry, including all AIS patients treated with IVT one year before (rt-PA: June 2023–May 2024) and one year after transition (TNK: June 2024–May 2025). IVT was analyzed in both the conventional (≤4.5h) and extended (>4.5h) treatment windows, as well as in off-label scenarios such as treatment under oral anticoagulation (OAC). Primary endpoints included treatment metrics (door-to-needle [DTN], imaging-to-needle, door-to-groin, and door-to-recanalization times). Safety endpoints comprised any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH (sICH; SITS-MOST). Results: A total of 591 patients received IVT (rt-PA: n=278; TNK: n=313), 69% within ≤4.5h and 31% beyond 4.5h. DTN times were significantly shorter with TNK compared to rt-PA (31 min [IQR 22–48] vs. 35 min [26–54]; p=0.002), driven by reduced imaging-to-needle times (12 min [7–25] vs. 16 min [9–29]; p<0.001). Safety outcomes showed no significant differences between TNK and rt-PA – neither overall (any ICH: 8% vs. 7%, p=0.12; sICH [SITS-MOST]: 1% vs. 1%, p=0.75) nor across different treatment windows and off-label scenarios such as IVT under OAC. Conclusion: In this large, real-world, one-year cohort comparison, transitioning from rt-PA to TNK improved treatment efficiency while maintaining comparable safety. TNK proved feasible and safe not only within the conventional window but also beyond 4.5 hours and in selected off-label scenarios, supporting its role as a first-line thrombolytic agent in routine stroke care.

StrokeVol. 57(Suppl_1)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.